YOUR COMMUNIST MANIFESTO

This is a really long one.  It goes into what the Communists view as the history of society, and why they feel that they ultimately will control every country.

To understand where our government is headed, you first have to understand the underlying philosophy of Communism, and Socialism by extension.  I will attempt to clarify that philosophy in this article.

The Communist Manifesto of 1848 says that all parties in opposition to the old political system(s) will themselves be labeled as Communistic.  This is because Communism at that time was recognized as a world-wide force that is to be reckoned with.

“Where is the party in opposition that has not been decried as Communistic by its opponents in power?  Where is the Opposition that has not hurled back the branding reproach of Communism, against the more advanced opposition parties, as well as against its reactionary adversaries?

Two things result from this fact.

I.  Communism is already acknowledged by all European Powers to be itself a Power.

II.  It is high time that Communists should openly, in the face of the whole world, publish their views, their aims, their tendencies, and meet this nursery tale of the Spectre of Communism with a Manifesto of the party itself.” – Marx and Engels, the Communist Manifesto.

The Communists break into history at the point where humans are organized into societies.  Specifically, they are referring to societies where there is an organized division of labor.

“The history of all hitherto existing societies is the history of class struggles.  Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time ended, either in a revolutionary re-constitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes.” – Marx & Engels

The Communists feel that this is not a good thing.  According to the Communists, modern society rose out of the ashes of feudalism.  Basically, the ruling class of the kings, lords and knights were replaced by the bankers, the merchants, and the military that enforces their will.

“The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms.  It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones.  Our epoch, the epoch of the bourgeoisie, possesses, however, this distinctive feature: it has simplified the class antagonisms. Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes, directly facing each other: Bourgeoisie and Proletariat.” – Marx & Engels

The ruling bourgeoisie rose out of the serfs who became merchants.  This happened as towns grew into cities.  The tradesmen became the masses of the proletariat as increasing industrialization made the skills of the individual craftsmen obsolete.  Their lot degenerated into one of menial workers struggling with each other to obtain the mindless, low-skilled and low-paying jobs in the factories run by the bourgeoisie.  The discovery of the New World, and the opening up of trade of raw materials for finished products worldwide, sped this process up.  The discovery of steam power, the rise of the captains of industry, and the influence and control these richest of all men in the world had on the armies of their countries finished the process.

“Modern industry has established the world-market, for which the discovery of America paved the way.  This market has given an immense development to commerce, to navigation, to communication by land.  This development has, in its time, reacted on the extension of industry; and in proportion as industry, commerce, navigation, railways extended, in the same proportion the bourgeoisie developed, increased its capital, and pushed into the background every class handed down from the Middle Ages.” – Marx & Engels.

The rise of the bourgeoisie was the result of revolutions in manufacturing, marketing, and banking.  These were all centralized under the control of these former serfs.  They rose in power and influence as the former powers such as the royal families and the Church declined.

“Each step in the development of the bourgeoisie was accompanied by a corresponding political advance of that class.  An oppressed class under the sway of the feudal nobility, an armed and self-governing association in the mediaeval commune; here independent urban republic (as in Italy and Germany), there taxable “third estate” of the monarchy (as in France), afterwards, in the  period of manufacture proper, serving either the semi-feudal or the absolute monarchy as a counterpoise against the nobility, and, in fact, corner-stone of the great monarchies in general, the bourgeoisie has at last, since the establishment of Modern Industry and of the world-market, conquered for itself, in the modern representative State, exclusive political sway.  The executive of the modern State is but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie.” – Marx & Engels

In case you have not noticed already, Communism is an elitist doctrine.  The Communist Manifesto has already chosen to say that the rulers of the post-feudal world are nothing more than lowly serfs who have wrestled the power they hold from their rightful masters.

“The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations.  It has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his “natural superiors,” and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, than callous “cash payment.”  It has drowned the most heavenly ecstasies of religious fervour, of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine sentimentalism, in the icy water of egotistical calculation.  It has resolved personal worth into exchange value, and in place of the numberless and indefeasible chartered freedoms, has set up that single, unconscionable freedom–Free Trade.  In one word, for exploitation, veiled by religious and political illusions, naked, shameless, direct, brutal exploitation.” – Marx & Engels

So the former serfs, using all of the trappings of the former order to their advantage, such as religion and chivalry, have enslaved all of the other classes who were formerly above them.  The bourgeoisie themselves believe in nothing themselves except for money and power.  All the other classes are now trapped as their slaves in their system of hourly wages.  Even the family is now a relationship totally dependent upon the things that money can buy, and is dependent for its survival as a unit on the amount of money that is coming into the family as a result of their collective labors.

The bourgeoisie show off their power with massive private and public works.  The bourgeoisie cannot exist and maintain their control without constantly revolutionizing the processes of production.  This also results in further standardization of the workers into mere drones in the factories.

“Constant revolutionising of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainty and agitation distinguish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones.  All fixed, fast-frozen relations, with their train of ancient and venerable prejudices and opinions, are swept away, all new-formed ones become antiquated before they can ossify.  All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned, and man is at last compelled to face with sober senses, his real conditions of life, and his relations with his kind.” – Marx & Engels

Constant market expansion as resulted in the bourgeoisie settling every corner of the globe.  This has resulted in the imposition of the culture of the bourgeoisie on every culture the come into contact with and infiltrate for their mercantile ends. 

“All old-established national industries have been destroyed or are daily being destroyed.  They are dislodged by new industries, whose introduction becomes a life and death question for all civilised nations, by industries that no longer work up indigenous raw material, but raw material drawn from the remotest zones; industries whose products are consumed, not only at home, but in every quarter of the globe.  In place of the old wants, satisfied by the productions of the country, we find new wants, requiring for their satisfaction the products of distant lands and climes.  In place of the old local and national seclusion and self-sufficiency, we have intercourse in every direction, universal inter-dependence of nations.  And as in material, so also in intellectual production.  The intellectual creations of individual nations become common property.  National one-sidedness and narrow-mindedness become more and more impossible, and from the numerous national and local literatures, there arises a world literature.” – Marx & Engels

The influence of cheap, mass produced goods it to draw the most reluctant nations and societies into the bourgeoisie world. They do so, or perish.  The Manifesto refers to this world as “civilization”.  All other nations end up being patterned on the bourgeoisie model.

In the bourgeoisie world, the rural areas are now ruled by the cities.  In the eyes of Marx and Engels, city life is far better that the “idiocy” of rural life.

“The bourgeoisie has subjected the country to the rule of the towns.  It has created enormous cities, has greatly increased the urban population as compared with the rural, and has thus rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life.  Just as it has made the country dependent on the towns, so it has made barbarian and semi-barbarian countries dependent on the civilised ones, nations of peasants on nations of bourgeois, the East on the West.” – Marx and Engels

In this “rescuing” of the “Idiot” rural populations via their migration to the cities, the bourgeoisie has managed to consolidate the ownership of all property and industry from the hands of the many into the hands of the few.

“The bourgeoisie keeps more and more doing away with the scattered state of the population, of the means of production, and of property.  It has agglomerated production, and has concentrated property in a few hands.  The necessary consequence of this was political centralisation.  Independent, or but loosely connected provinces, with separate interests, laws, governments and systems of taxation, became lumped together into one nation, with one government, one code of laws, one national class-interest, one frontier and one customs-tariff.  The bourgeoisie, during its rule of scarce one hundred years, has created more massive and more colossal productive forces than have all preceding generations together.  Subjection of Nature’s forces to man, machinery, application of chemistry to industry and agriculture, steam-navigation, railways, electric telegraphs, clearing of whole continents for cultivation, canalisation of rivers, whole populations conjured out of the ground—what earlier century had even a presentiment that such productive forces slumbered in the lap of social labour?” – Marx & Engels

Marx and Engels contend that it was the methods of production and the way products were exchanged that gave rise to these now ruling serfs.  The advances in production and exchange were so far head of the stagnant feudal, agrarian society, that they took over to create a new political system that was controlled by the increasingly influential and powerful bourgeoisie.

“Into the[ ]…place [of feudal society] stepped free competition, accompanied by a social and political constitution adapted to it, and by the economical and political sway of the bourgeois class.  A similar movement is going on before our own eyes.  Modern bourgeois society with its relations of production, of exchange and of property, a society that has conjured up such gigantic means of production and of exchange, is like the sorcerer, who is no longer able to control the powers of the nether world whom he has called up by his spells.  For many a decade past the history of industry and commerce is but the history of the revolt of modern productive forces against modern conditions of production, against the property relations that are the conditions for the existence of the bourgeoisie and of its rule.  It is enough to mention the commercial crises that by their periodical return put on its trial, each time more threateningly, the existence of the entire bourgeois society.  In these crises a great part not only of the existing products, but also of the previously created productive forces, are periodically destroyed.” – Marx & Engels

Marx and Engels then say that there are crises of overproduction, which threaten the bourgeoisie themselves.  There are natural  limits to market expansion.  To preserve their way of life, the bourgeoisie conquer new markets, wage wars of destruction wherein the replacement products will be required, and create new needs within existing markets by advertising and promoting new products and constantly upgraded models of existing products.  The result of this is even greater expansion of bourgeoisie-controlled means of production, banking, and monetary availability to serve the bourgeoisie, which is unsustainable.  Additional mineral extraction for the production of cheap goods with planned obsolescences is required.  This results in increasingly severe crises within bourgeoisie society, which threatens that very society more and more each time.

“The weapons with which the bourgeoisie felled feudalism to the ground are now turned against the bourgeoisie itself.  But not only has the bourgeoisie forged the weapons that bring death to itself; it has also called into existence the men who are to wield those weapons–the modern working class—the proletarians.  In proportion as the bourgeoisie, i.e., capital, is developed, in the same proportion is the proletariat, the modern working class, developed–a class of labourers, who live only so long as they find work, and who find work only so long as their labour increases capital.  These labourers, who must sell themselves piece-meal, are a commodity, like every other article of commerce, and are consequently exposed to all the vicissitudes of competition, to all the fluctuations of the market.”

“Owing to the extensive use of machinery and to division of labour, the work of the proletarians has lost all individual character, and consequently, all charm for the workman.  He becomes an appendage of the machine, and it is only the most simple, most monotonous, and most easily acquired knack, that is required of him.  Hence, the cost of production of a workman is restricted, almost entirely, to the means of subsistence that he requires for his maintenance, and for the propagation of his race.  But the price of a commodity, and therefore also of labour, is equal to its cost of production.  In proportion therefore, as the repulsiveness of the work increases, the wage decreases.  Nay more, in proportion as the use of machinery and division of labour increases, in the same proportion the burden of toil also increases, whether by prolongation of the working hours, by increase of the work exacted in a given time or by increased speed of the machinery, etc.”

“Modern industry has converted the little workshop of the patriarchal master into the great factory of the industrial capitalist.  Masses of labourers, crowded into the factory, are organised like soldiers.  As privates of the industrial army they are placed under the command of a perfect hierarchy of officers and sergeants.  Not only are they slaves of the bourgeois class, and of the bourgeois State; they are daily and hourly enslaved by the machine, by the over-looker, and, above all, by the individual bourgeois manufacturer himself.  The more openly this despotism proclaims gain to be its end and aim, the more petty, the more hateful and the more embittering it is.” – Marx and Engels

Does this all sound familiar so far?  Seem reasonable?  Well, read on.

“The less the skill and exertion of strength implied in manual labour, in other words, the more modern industry becomes developed, the more is the labour of men superseded by that of women. Differences of age and sex have no longer any distinctive social validity for the working class. All are instruments of labour, more or less expensive to use, according to their age and sex.”

“No sooner is the exploitation of the labourer by the manufacturer, so far at an end, that he receives his wages in cash, than he is set upon by the other portions of the bourgeoisie, the landlord, the shopkeeper, the pawnbroker, etc.”

“The lower strata of the middle class–the small tradespeople, shopkeepers, retired tradesmen generally, the handicraftsmen and peasants–all these sink gradually into the proletariat, partly because their diminutive capital does not suffice for the scale on which Modern Industry is carried on, and is swamped in the competition with the large capitalists, partly because their specialized skill is rendered worthless by the new methods of production.  Thus the proletariat is recruited from all classes of the population.” —Marx & Engels

Yes, that is how it is going here in the U.S.A.  But wait, there’s more!

Initially, as the fledging bourgeoisie rises to power, the infant proletariat class struggles against the bourgeoisie.  They destroy individual products, the means of production.  This is started on an individual basis.  The Luddites comes to mind here.  Eventually this catches on, and they start to organize.  This is the Molly Maguire stage.  This is still a struggle against individual bourgeoisie and their factories.  At this stage, the bourgeoisie are still able to pit workers against themselves, like the Pinkertons against the Unions.

“At this stage, therefore, the proletarians do not fight their enemies, but the enemies of their enemies, the remnants of absolute monarchy, the landowners, the non-industrial bourgeois, the petty bourgeoisie.  Thus the whole historical movement is concentrated in the hands of the bourgeoisie; every victory so obtained is a victory for the bourgeoisie.” – Marx & Engels

This is more a European condition that an American one, but we have our parallels here.  The riots and resentment are directed against old royal lines and the shopkeepers, who can lose everything in the riots.  But the industrialists who control the markets are not touched by this strife.

“But with the development of industry the proletariat not only increases in number; it becomes concentrated in greater masses, its strength grows, and it feels that strength more.  The various interests and conditions of life within the ranks of the proletariat are more and more equalised, in proportion as machinery obliterates all distinctions of labour, and nearly everywhere reduces wages to the same low level.  The growing competition among the bourgeois, and the resulting commercial crises, make the wages of the workers ever more fluctuating.  The unceasing improvement of machinery, ever more rapidly developing, makes their livelihood more and more precarious; the collisions between individual workmen and individual bourgeois take more and more the character of collisions between two classes.  Thereupon the workers begin to form combinations (Trades Unions) against the bourgeois; they club together in order to keep up the rate of wages; they found permanent associations in order to make provision beforehand for these occasional revolts.  Here and there the contest breaks out into riots.”

“Now and then the workers are victorious, but only for a time. The real fruit of their battles lies, not in the immediate result, but in the ever-expanding union of the workers.  This union is helped on by the improved means of communication that are created by modern industry and that place the workers of different localities in contact with one another.  It was just this contact that was needed to centralise the numerous local struggles, all of the same character, into one national struggle between classes.  But every class struggle is a political struggle.  And that union, to attain which the burghers of the Middle Ages, with their miserable highways, required centuries, the modern proletarians, thanks to railways, achieve in a few years.” – Marx & Engels

For today, you can substitute the printed, televised and social media for the railways in the last sentence of the preceding paragraph.

“This organisation of the proletarians into a class, and consequently into a political party, is continually being upset again by the competition between the workers themselves.  But it ever rises up again, stronger, firmer, mightier.  It compels legislative recognition of particular interests of the workers, by taking advantage of the divisions among the bourgeoisie itself.  Thus the ten-hours’ bill in England was carried.” – Marx & Engels

You can see this happening today, if you consider all of the people who do not control the banks and industry as the proletariat, whether they are “workers” or not.  I am using this definition very loosely in describing modern American society.  As little as 100 years ago, there was no Nanny State.

The bourgeoisie is in constant conflict with the old aristocracy and with members of the bourgeoisie who are anti-progress and anti-industry.  Also, foreign bourgeoisie try to influence what happens in other countries, as they want to control the means of production and property there.  In order to maintain their control, the bourgeoisie require the cooperation of the people.  They need to fill the positions in the police and the military.  They have to buy into the idea of bourgeoisie society itself.  They have to think that, with luck and hard work, they themselves may rise to be bourgeoisie.

The American Dream is bourgeoisie.  And it is antithetic to Communism.

The bourgeoisie is thus forced to become directly involved in politics, as a matter of self-preservation.

“The bourgeoisie itself, therefore, supplies the proletariat with its own instruments of political and general education, in other words, it furnishes the proletariat with weapons for fighting the bourgeoisie.”

“Further, as we have already seen, entire sections of the ruling classes are, by the advance of industry, precipitated into the proletariat, or are at least threatened in their conditions of existence.  These also supply the proletariat with fresh elements of enlightenment and progress.”

“Finally, in times when the class struggle nears the decisive hour, the process of dissolution going on within the ruling class, in fact within the whole range of society, assumes such a violent, glaring character, that a small section of the ruling class cuts itself adrift, and joins the revolutionary class, the class that holds the future in its hands.  Just as, therefore, at an earlier period, a section of the nobility went over to the bourgeoisie, so now a portion of the bourgeoisie goes over to the proletariat, and in particular, a portion of the bourgeois ideologists, who have raised themselves to the level of comprehending theoretically the historical movement as a whole.” – Marx & Engels

This says that some of the former slaves who were a part of the ruling class feel threatened by that ruling class, and will join with their former masters to revolt against their former compatriots.  This can be outright revolution, or can be accomplished via the political arena.

“Of all the classes that stand face to face with the bourgeoisie today, the proletariat alone is a really revolutionary class.  The other classes decay and finally disappear in the face of Modern Industry; the proletariat is its special and essential product.  The lower middle class, the small manufacturer, the shopkeeper, the artisan, the peasant, all these fight against the bourgeoisie, to save from extinction their existence as fractions of the middle class.  They are therefore not revolutionary, but conservative.  Nay more, they are reactionary, for they try to roll back the wheel of history.  If by chance they are revolutionary, they are so only in view of their impending transfer into the proletariat, they thus defend not their present, but their future interests, they desert their own standpoint to place themselves at that of the proletariat.” – Marx & Engels

Marx & Engels say that the middle class who join with the Communists do so only to preserve their lives in the future.  They are still “social scum” who are not to be trusted.  It is implicit that the middle class is bourgeoisie, and must also be destroyed.  They are the most dangerous class of all.

“In the conditions of the proletariat, those of old society at large are already virtually swamped.  The proletarian is without property; his relation to his wife and children has no longer anything in common with the bourgeois family-relations; modern industrial labour, modern subjection to capital, the same in England as in France, in America as in Germany, has stripped him of every trace of national character.  Law, morality, religion, are to him so many bourgeois prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests.” – Marx & Engels

Since they have nothing of their own, and nothing to lose, the proletarians must destroy all reassurances that the private ownership of property will be honored.  This includes all forms of property.  The lowest stratum of any society must destroy all other strata of society if they are to get rid of the bourgeoisie rulers and take over all property and means of production for themselves.

This concept assumes that the lowest stratum of any society is composed of workers.  People who have jobs, because there is no Nanny State.

“Though not in substance, yet in form, the struggle of the proletariat with the bourgeoisie is at first a national struggle.  The proletariat of each country must, of course, first of all settle matters with its own bourgeoisie.”  — Marx & Engels

This says that the Communists seek to take over the world one country at a time.  Their struggle for world dominion endures until the last non-Communist country left standing falls sway to their ideology.  They work behind the scenes, gaining an inch here, a foot there, until the bourgeoisie and the middle class fight back.  There is no telling where the Communist inroads within an individual society will end.  They are patient.  When the Communists determine that they are capable of making no further gains via a country’s established legal means, then they promise an open revolution against the Bourgeoisie and the middle class.

“Hitherto, every form of society has been based, as we have already seen, on the antagonism of oppressing and oppressed classes.  But in order to oppress a class, certain conditions must be assured to it under which it can, at least, continue its slavish existence.  The serf, in the period of serfdom, raised himself to membership in the commune, just as the petty bourgeois, under the yoke of feudal absolutism, managed to develop into a bourgeois.  The modern laborer, on the contrary, instead of rising with the progress of industry, sinks deeper and deeper below the conditions of existence of his own class.  He becomes a pauper, and pauperism develops more rapidly than population and wealth.  And here it becomes evident, that the bourgeoisie is unfit any longer to be the ruling class in society, and to impose its conditions of existence upon society as an over-riding law.  It is unfit to rule because it is incompetent to assure an existence to its slave within his slavery, because it cannot help letting him sink into such a state, that it has to feed him, instead of being fed by him.  Society can no longer live under this bourgeoisie, in other words, its existence is no longer compatible with society.” – Marx & Engels

This says that a society where the worker has no hope of rising up out of his miserable state is one that is ripe for, nay, deserves, a Communist revolution.  The very creation of a central banking and monetary system coupled with an hourly wage system results in the individual workers associating and seeing their common plight.  This leads to solidarity and revolution.

“The development of Modern Industry, therefore, cuts from under its feet the very foundation on which the bourgeoisie produces and appropriates products.  What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, is its own grave-diggers.  Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable.” – Marx & Engels.

So what is the difference between the Communists and the proletariat?

“The Communists, therefore, are on the one hand, practically, the most advanced and resolute section of the working-class parties of every country, that section which pushes forward all others; on the other hand, theoretically, they have over the great mass of the proletariat the advantage of clearly understanding the line of march, the conditions, and the ultimate general results of the proletarian movement.”

Here that are saying, “We Commies are tricky bastards, and will do whatever it takes to promote our agenda.  No matter how long it takes.  We want you to trust us, even though you would be crazy to do so.”

“The immediate aim of the Communist is the same as that of all the other proletarian parties: formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat.” – Marx & Engels

I will for the most part stop here.  The history presented here via the eyes of Marx & Engels is only slightly different from the history of our society.  I will throw in the caveat that it was said that England is the only country that is revolution-proof, as everyone there is bourgeoisie.  Everyone there had someone they could look down their noses at.  Everyone there thought that the possibility existed that, through thrift,. Hard work, and a little luck, you could move up in the social strata.

They did not say that about the U.S.A.

Mark and Engels were not of the proletariat.  They made several untenable assumptions.  The first is that there is no possibility of upward mobility.  The second is that there will eventually be no middle class.  Every country has its middle class, as it cannot function without at least a small middle class.  The third is that you work or you starve.  In their time, there was not much in the way of a social net.

The fourth assumption is that the proletariat will eventually become homogeneous.  They will all have the same ambitions, the same aspirations, the same desires.  They will all work together for the betterment of their fellows.  They will all be altruistic, with the betterment of their fellow downtrodden ones being their ultimate goal.  All will be selfless.

Even their leaders.  Their leaders will work for them altruistically, taking nothing for themselves.  They do not relish or desire power.  If they did, they would not be true proletariat.  They will be incorruptible, unlike the bourgeoisie .

That will never happen.

Marx & Engels assumed that all workers will be atheistic.  They will have no allegiances to any country, political system, or society.

They will not value the family.  They will be totally broken.  Without any sense of self-worth.  Without a smidgen of personal dignity.

They got that one wrong.

So, how do you get the Communist revolution started in the U.S., where everyone is bourgeoisie, and wants to move up?

Simple.

You create an underclass.  A class composed of ones with no hope, no religion, no morality.  Ones who do not even try to better themselves.  You foment divisiveness in the society.  You promote policies that lead to conflict between groups.  You promote policies that lead to financial uncertainty.  You print more paper money, so that inflation eats at the living standards and savings of the people.  You punish initiative with graduated taxes.  You promote policies that erode wealth, the ability to acquire property, and to earn a living wage.  You leave those at the top with sufficient tax deductions that they pay less taxes than the middle class.  This breeds resentment against them.

You fill all government offices with appointees who are also Communist at heart, if not by direct affiliation.  You pass laws that erode the standing of all classes, trying to bring them down into one Untermenschen class.  You promote laziness.  You take over the schools, and teach “socialist” ideas there.  You cheapen the value of all human life.  You create policies that promote crime and violence.  You try to erode the industries that provide decent wages.  You try to obstruct industrial development on the home front.  You engage in policies that guarantee the mobility of wealth out of your country.  You enlist celebrities in promoting your agenda.  You have a strong presence at the polling stations.

You pass laws giving yourself the power to interfere in every aspect of the lives of the citizens.  You denigrate nationalism, or any identity with any specific group that is not proletariat.  You denigrate religion, or any type of belief structure.  You deny the existence of any God, and try to prevent the very mention of the Word.  You try to take away all hope.  Only the hopeless, those with nothing to lose, will rise up.  You promote an antagonism between the haves and the have nots’.

You try to create a two party system, and align yourself with one of the parties.  Using that party, you take over the country.  You are now free to pass laws that victimize the opposing party.  You use proposed legislation to try to get that party divided against itself.  Divide and conquer.  If it does not die of its own accord, you legislate it out of existence.  You demonize all who oppose you.  You try to oppress them in the press.  You have their neighbors try to pressure them.  If that does not work, their neighbors vilify them.  And if that does not work, ultimately you imprison them, or you have them all killed.

I found the closing statements to the State of the Union Address to be the most interesting of he address.

“That’s just the way we’re made.  We may do different jobs and wear different uniforms, and hold different views than the person beside us.  But as Americans, we all share the same proud title — we are citizens.  It’s a word that doesn’t just describe our nationality or legal status.  It describes the way we’re made.  It describes what we believe.  It captures the enduring idea that this country only works when we accept certain obligations to one another and to future generations, that our rights are wrapped up in the rights of others; and that well into our third century as a nation, it remains the task of us all, as citizens of these United States, to be the authors of the next great chapter of our American story.

Thank you. God bless you, and God bless these United States of America.”  (Applause.)

END

10:16 P.M.

“[W]e all share the same proud title – we are citizens.”  How does this read if you substitute “proletarians”  for “citizens”?

“It’s a word that doesn’t describe our nationality or legal status.”  Is this spoken by an American, or a citizen of the world?  You decide.

“It captures the enduring idea that this country only works when we accept certain obligations to one another and to future generations”.  And what are those particular obligations?  A responsibility to the goals of the proletariat?  You decide.

“[T}hat our rights are wrapped up in the rights of others”.  From each according to his abilities; to each according to his needs?  It’s up to you, guys.

”[A]and that well into our third century as a nation, it remains the task of us all, as citizens of these United States, to be the authors of the next great chapter of our American story.  First, the feudal plantations and indentured servants;  next, the bourgeoisie Constitutional Republic flowering into true representative democracy;  thirdly, the ultimate victory of the proletariat?  It’s your call on this one.

What are we writing or rewriting in what Obama describes as this “next great chapter” of our history?

I will leave the “God bless” part up to you also.

Otherwise, it was a pretty predictable speech.  It actually almost sounded like an American President was really giving it.

You can read the whole Communist Manifesto and the State of the Union speech at these links:

http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/61/pg61.txt

http://www.archive.org/stream/manifestocommun00engegoog/manifestocommun00engegoog_djvu.txt

http://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-tools/the-communist-manifesto-original-text-t3022.html

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/12/remarks-president-state-union-address

http://www.bizjournals.com/jacksonville/news/2013/02/13/missed-obamas-state-of-the-union.html

Follow The D.C. Clothesline on Facebook

Don't forget to follow the D.C. Clothesline on Facebook and Twitter. PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

0 Responses to YOUR COMMUNIST MANIFESTO

  1. Gary Harper says:

    Nice comment. Did you ever consider posting it on the new DC Clothesline?

  2. This is not the complete list; it was taken from the 45 Communist goals that found their way down the halls of our great Capitol back in 1963.

    Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record–Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963 Current Communist Goals EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, January 10, 1963 .

    3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

    15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

    17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
     
    24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.
     
    25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

    26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.” 

    (Leviticus 20:13If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.)

    27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a “religious crutch.”

    29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

    30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”

    31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the “big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

    36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
     
    37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

    “There exists in this country a plot to enslave every man woman and child. Before I leave this high and noble office, I intend to expose this plot.”-President John F. Kennedy -7 days before he was murdered.

    Luke 10:18And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.
    In ancient Hebrew the word for lightning is barack, the word for heaven or the heights is bama and to connect the words either an “a” or an “o” is used.

    “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” – Barack Hussein Obama – Audacity of Hope

    2 Thessalonians 2:3 (King James Version)
    3Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

    Political Correctness a term first seen in Mao’s Little Red Book, a communist engendered abomination that is instituting censorship little by little.

    “If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”- George Washington

    Carl  Marx, once wrote that, the goal of the Communists was to quote,. “enter into men’s minds and cast God down from his throne.”

    Matthew 12:31Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men.

     

    In ancient Babylon their economy was based on usury.
    “If you lend money to one of my people among you who is needy, do not be like a moneylender; charge him no interest. Exodus 22:25
    Hath given forth upon usury, and hath taken increase: shall he then live? he shall not live: he hath done all these abominations; he shall surely die; his blood shall be upon him. Ezekiel 18:13
    Usury is unlawful; expressly prohibited by GOD!
     Article 1 Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution clearly states that only the Congress can coin money! 

    The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was slipped thru congress during the Christmas break with the majority of it’s members absent. 

    The Federal Reserve is self serving and privately owned in violation to the Constitution, charging interest on illegally printed money. Money printed from nothing!
     The name “Federal Reserve” was carefully chosen and designed to deceive Americans into believing they were part of our Government when in fact it is privately owned by international bankers in direct violation to  Article 1 Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution.
    In America On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. Five months later A UNITED STATES PRESIDENT, PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY was MURDERED BY COMMUNIST! 

    Our own US Congress voted themselves a raise. (But vetoed a raise for those on Social Security) A member of Congress only have to be in Congress one time to receive a pension that is more than $15,000 per month. And most are now equal to being millionaires plus.  If some one in the military stays  in for 20 years (providing that they are not killed in combat before that) and gets out as an E-7, they may receive a pension of $2,000 per month, and the very people who placed them in harm’s way receives a pension of $15,000 per month.

    The debt added by the previous 43 U.S. Presidents from 1789 through 2002 combined was
       $6.3 trillion

    The debt added by Obama is
        $6.5 trillion

     “I am for socialism, disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself… I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal.”
    Roger Baldwin, Communist, was born in Wellesley MA and co-founded the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

    “If you lend money to one of my people among you who is needy, do not be like a moneylender; charge him no interest. Exodus 22:25
    Hath given forth upon usury, and hath taken increase: shall he then live? he shall not live: he hath done all these abominations; he shall surely die; his blood shall be upon him. Ezekiel 18:13
    Usury is unlawful; expressly prohibited by GOD!
     
     
    In ancient Babylon their priest sacrificed babies to their gods baal, and molech.  
    In America the communist under their socialist programs have sacrificed over 50 million American babies to their god satan!

    Jeremiah 32:35 
    And they built the high places of Baal, which are in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to cause their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire unto Molech; which I commanded them not, neither came it into my mind, that they should do this abomination, to cause Judah to sin.

    Leviticus 20:2-5
    2Again, thou shalt say to the children of Israel , Whosoever he be of the children of Israel , or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel , that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall surely be put to death: the people of the land shall stone him with stones.
    3And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off from among his people; because he hath given of his seed unto Molech, to defile my sanctuary, and to profane my holy name.
    4And if the people of the land do any ways hide their eyes from the man, when he giveth of his seed unto Molech, and kill him not:
    5Then I will set my face against that man, and against his family, and will cut him off, and all that go a whoring after him, to commit whoredom with Molech, from among their people.
     
    It is difficult for many people to accept the truth that several of our nations top leaders have been members of the occultic Bohemian Grove. George W. Bush is also a member of this occult organization. Since 1873, the Global Elite Has Held Secret Meetings in the Ancient Redwood Forest of Northern California . Members of the so-called “Bohemian Club” Include Former Presidents Eisenhower, Nixon and Reagan. The Bush Family Maintains a Strong Involvement. Each Year at Bohemian Grove, Members of This All-Male “Club” Don Red, Black and Silver Robes and Conduct an Occult Ritual Wherein They Worship a Giant Stone Owl, Sacrificing a Human Being in Effigy to What They Call the “Great Owl of Bohemia.

    “Leviticus 26
    1Ye shall make you no idols nor graven image, neither rear you up a standing image, neither shall ye set up any image of stone in your land, to bow down unto it: for I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:4
    4Turn ye not unto idols, nor make to yourselves molten gods: I am the LORD your God.
    Leviticus 20:6-8 (King James Version)
    6And the soul that turneth after such as have familiar spirits, and after wizards, to go a whoring after them, I will even set my face against that soul, and will cut him off from among his people.

    Isaiah 5:20
     20Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

    Luke 22:35-36 Then Jesus asked them, “When I sent you without purse, bag or sandals, did you lack anything?” “Nothing,” they answered. 36 He said to them, “But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.
     
    Acts 5: 29Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.

     “I don’t believe people should be able to own guns.” – Barack Hussein Obama
     
     
    Jeremiah 50:16Cut off the sower from Babylon, and him that handleth the SICKLE in the time of harvest: for fear of the oppressing sword they shall turn every one to his people, and they shall flee every one to his own land.
    Jeremiah 50:23How is the HAMMER OF THE WHOLE EARTH CUT ASUNDER AND BROKEN! how is Babylon become a desolation among the nations!
    BABYLON = the HAMMER and SICKLE!
     
     
    Jeremiah 50:14-15.    14 Put yourselves in array against Babylon round about: all ye that bend the bow, shoot at her, spare no arrows: for she hath sinned against the LORD. 15 Shout against her round about: she hath given her hand: her foundations are fallen , her walls are thrown down : for it is the vengeance of the LORD: take vengeance upon her; as she hath done , do unto her.

    Revelation 18:21 And a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying , Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down , and shall be found no more at all. 

    - The U.N. Charter was written by Alger Hiss, Molotov and Vishinsky

           — Molotov and Alger Hiss made a secret agreement that the military chief of the U.N. was always to be a Russian, appointed by Moscow

        — It was Russia who insisted the U.N. be placed on U.S. soil
            — Whole sections of the U.N. Charter were copied intact, word for word from the Russian Constitution

            — Kruschev’s orders to the communists have been “Rule the U.N.”

           — The only two U.S.A. Senators who voted against the U.N. Treaty Charter were the only two Senators who had read it

     — The U.N. is helpless on vital questions because Russia has veto power.

           — Under the U.N. setup, the U.S. taxpayers have been forced to make up the U.N. treasury deficit of millions of dollars for Russia refuses to pay her share.

           — The U.N. has never passed a resolution condemning Russia or her so-called satellites – but it does condemn our allies.

           — J. Edgar Hoover of the F.B.I. said, “The overwhelming majority of the Communist delegations to the U.N. are espionage agents.

    — At the time of the Korean War there were 60 nations in the U.N. Yet 93% of the U.N. forces were Americans, and 95% of the cost was borne by Americans.

           — The U.N. policy during the Korean War was to prevent America from winning the victory over the communists.

           — The U.N. was responsible for aiding Castro.

           — Article 47, Par. 3 of the U.N. Charter states: “The Military Staff Committee shall be responsible through the Security Council for the strategic direction of any armed forces placed at the disposal of the Security Council”.

           — All battle plans of General MacArthur had to go through this Soviet Chief.

           — Any future wars fought by the U.N. would be fought under the same military operations controlled by the U.N. Security Council.

    — God is not mentioned in the U.N. Charter and meetings are not opened with prayer? The Communist co-creators of the U.N. had it agreed that there should be no mention of God and Jesus Christ.

    Communist Goals (1963)
    #11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

    “The American people will never 
    knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of ‘liberalism’ they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.”— Norman Thomas, Socialist Party Presidential Candidate in 1940, 1944 and 1948, co-founder of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
    “Be extremely subtle, even to the point of formlessness. Be extremely mysterious, even to the point of soundlessness. Thereby you can be the director of the opponent’s fate.”
    Sun Tzu 
    “We can’t expect the American people to jump from capitalism to communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of socialism, until they awaken one day to find that they have communism.”—Nikita Kruschev, former Soviet Premier/dictator.

    The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the Americans freedom and before I leave office I must inform the Citizen of his plight.” PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY
    (5  months after he signed Executive Order 11110, and 10 days before he was murdered)

    The number murdered by Communist regimes or organizations in the past hundred years stands at roughly 120 million. Just for the sake of this ideology, these people were removed from their homes, worked to death in concentration camps, exiled to perish on the Siberian steppes, subjected to the horrible tortures in the most horrible prisons, executed by brainwashed Communist militants, strangled, had their throats cut, or starved to death in deliberately-created famines.
    The savagery of this red terror began first in Russia during the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917.

    Jeremiah 50:14-15.    14 Put yourselves in array against Babylon round about: all ye that bend the bow, shoot at her, spare no arrows: for she hath sinned against the LORD. 15 Shout against her round about: she hath given her hand: her foundations are fallen , her walls are thrown down : for it is the vengeance of the LORD: take vengeance upon her; as she hath done , do unto her.

    All nations compassed me about: but in the name of the LORD will I destroy them. Psalm 118:10

    Revelation 18:1-8
    1 And after these things I saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was lightened with his glory. 2 And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying , Babylon the great is fallen , is fallen , and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. 3 For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. 4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying , Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. 5 For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities. 6 Reward her even as she rewarded you, and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup which she hath filled fill to her double. 7 How much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously , so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow. 8 Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her.

    “The thing that separates the American Christian from every other person on earth is the fact that he would rather die on his feet, than live on his knees!”. George Washington

      2 Timothy 2:15   Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. 

    Jeremiah 48: 10Cursed be he that doeth the work of the LORD deceitfully, and cursed be he that keepeth back his sword from blood.

    Revelation 18:21 And a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying , Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down , and shall be found no more at all.

    “NO KING BUT KING JESUS!”
            

     

  3. Gary Harper says:

    There’s more, in future posts. I am telling you what Marx and Engels said, and how it is related to today. People need to understand what Communism is about, as the politics of today read right out of this Manifesto. And you see what that did to Russia for 79 years. I find the manifesto to be scary, because the basic premise underlying it is that the Republic we know is only the middle of three stages, with world-wide Clommunism being the last stage, replacing the Republic. This post only covers the first Chapter of the Manifesto, which is mostly their slanted view of history.

  4. Gary Harper says:

    The Constitution was written to outlive administrations like we have right now. Both Marx and Jefferson agreed on one thing — the conflict is eternal, and the revolution can never end until there is a final victory of one side or the other. Both the Communist Manifesto and the Constitution were composed in response to specific ideas about about society, control, and revolution.

    The premise of the Constitution is that the majority can be wrong sometimes, and will then act outside of their own best interests. The safegards in it are to ensure that the will of a misguided majority is not imposed on the minority who history will prove to be right all along. The Constitution was written to ensure that the people are not conquered by any external or internal group which proclaims to know what is best for them, and proposes to mold them into the model citizens of the future.

    Freedom is a messy affair. But it is exciting to live free. Life under government slave masters is relatively predictable and boring. Nothing ever changes. There is nothing to look forward to but the empty promises of some far off future.

    The premise of the Communist Manifesto is that the majority are never wrong, at least after they have been fully educated. It is the job of Communism to control and mold them into the people they were always meant to be. Until that is done, the uneducated majority may act outside of their own best interests. Communism needs to control them with an iron fist, to ensure that they are properly molded, so that they can eventually be set free again. After they all have become clones of one another.

    Which future do you want?

    • FredAURick Alyone AshAUR says:

      Gary, it may be a sobering -even daunting for you- realisation that not only does “the Tree of Liberty need BLOOD every 15 years or so” as Jeffy Boy so breezily put it while he ran off to Paris instead of shouldering a gun -or was out fucking his blackfolks, HE ALSO said this:- eventually one RACE WILL HAVE TO ANNIHILATE THE OTHER -sic! He said this about THIS nation, America, l-o-n-g before Stalin then Hitler H-A-D to at least TRY to eliminate the INTENTIONALLY unfit as well as the helplessly no goods.
      Will Durant, American and the greatest all round and well balanced in viewpoints Historian that EVER has lived so far…, brought out that “the Eternal War between Business and Law” HA$ to go on and on until the Have$ have almost ALL and the people HAVE to rise in hellmaking revolution and the Great Game $tart$ all over again,,,,,! (And again and AGAIN and again…, down through EVERY history we have ANY access to!!)
      So, Gary, WHAT -really W-H-A-T can or $HOULD “WE THE PEOPLE” (or proletariat or whatever like “citizens” or whatEVER the term may be like “fellow christians” or “believers” it really I-$ just all the same down where the hairs get short and surging FEELINGS overrule ‘the mind’) -ye$ Gary what C-A-N we actually D-O….?
      Answaur (not just ‘anser’):- WE c-a-n actually Establish JU$TICE! WE really C-A-N “in$URE dome$tic tranquility”! WE can NATURALLY work towards a More PERFECT U-n-i-o-n (not 2 or many parties and clique$ but REAL UNION!) We actually C-A-N provide FOR the COMMON defen$e($)! WE actually $HOULD -and CAN!- promote the GENERAL Welfare ($tate) -i$ A-N-Y other, any le$$ worth a snort in this REAL world of hungry twice EVERY day at lea$t…????
      WE THE PEOPLE actually N-E-E-D -and thus C-A-N- $ecure to ourselves A-N-D our posterity the BLE$$ING$ of REAL Liberty NOT some mere ‘free’ DUMBness only media pu$hed like we today only yak up as if LIBERTY UNDER LAW never existed. And we only need the BLE$$ING$, Gary, of even REAL Liberty. TO HELL WITH FREE-DUM AND FREE DUMMMIE$!!
      Gary, THOSE 52 WORDS of September 1787 really AUR The Most TRUE & PO$$IBLE Ideals we humonkeys, humutts, AND some Few HuMANs…, have ever or will E-V-A-U-R attain to or NEED ATTAIN TO. Period. It was and I$ TODAY “Those Only Fifty Two Words” that were and A-U-R “THE” Constitution “FOR the UNITED States of AMERICA” -that will $oon and from now on H-A-V-E to become A-M-A-U-R-I-C-A The En L I G H T ened -or (h)el$e…..
      $o don’t worry about what even the $tooooopid russies have -finally- gotten OVER! Today CHINA is the MO$T out and OUT ‘capitalist’ outfit going! WE in Amokia the wage $laved -then plumbfucked out of work at ALL!- have been just diddlefucking ourselves a-w-a-y until our Bill Gate$’s and Warren Buffett$ have us HOGTIED in EVERY way there is! We need a TOTAL guillotining of EVERYbody who “run$ a bu$ine$$” today. As Kennedy said his dad told him:- ALL bu$ine$$men AUR JUST SON$ OF BITCHE$ -as today they A-L-L $ure as shit A-U-R -in $pade$. But we $illy chump$ keep right on going to ‘parties’ -some for coke to $nort -the rest for this or that political ‘party’ NEVER ONCE $EEING THAT A-L-L AUR AND HAVE TO BE M-O-N-E-Y ‘partie$’….!!!!
      Gary, what about just plain being AMERICAN$ -like George Washington WARNED us about what would happen if we FAILED to be….? TO H-E-L-L WITH A-L-L our pre$ent day $illier than shit ‘parties’ LETS JUST BE CONSTITUTIONALIAN AMERICAN$ -and hove ever more centrally INTO THOSE 52 WORDS of that Grand Old Constitution that N-E-V-A-U-R can or ever will be changed AT ALL IN ANY WAY!
      THAT fact, Gary is SO FAR BEYOND all the chitchat that you and the others jabber away about on Dean’s Clothesline, that I really B-E-G you just to look in the mirror and slowly just to and for YOUR OWN SELF really r–e—a—-d…, slowly and out loud Those 52 Words that aur like NO others ever precisely BECAUSE they SUM UP ALL previous good words with NONE of the bad ones and their ideas are in Those 52 WORDS -AT ALL! (THAT, Gary, is w—h—y They Will NEVER Be Changed -AT ALL!)
      Thank you for giving us so running a presentation Gary, and now YOU TOO c-a-n have and hold and PRO$PER FROM NOW ON W-I-T-H….. Those Fifty Two Words that really A-U-R The Highest & Best A-N-D the most ACTUALLY OBEYABLE IN THIS REAL “MONEY AN$WERETH A-L-L THINGS” WORLD WHEREIN “THE L-A-C-K OF MONEY (really) I$ The Root of A-L-L evil” -as Koheleth AND Paul told us over 2000 years ago in Koheleth’s case (Ecclesiastes 10:19 A.V.) and 1900 in that infamously MI$translated passage in I Timothy 6:10…. (As Will Durant has $O repletely confirmed in his Story of Civili$ation series of 11 big books. He $ays this:- from as short as 200 to as long as 900 years it has taken for the grabber$ to grab it ALL and then the people have to ARISE AND KILL OFF their oppre$$or$ -and it $tart$ all over again -then again!)
      WE THE PEOPLE will $oon H-A-V-E to exert our “COMMON defen$e” -or (H)el$e Gary and THAT is what Dean HAS so bravely been TRYING at least…, to show us!

  5. Pingback: Communism and Quotations « Our Weekly Coffee

  6. Citizen Patriot says:

    Obama launches the totalitarian state with no coverage or reporting by the MSM.

    http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/big-brother-to-monitor-sovereign-citizens/

    The Regime in Power (RIP) is bastardizing the definition of a patriot in this country. It is an attempt to separate the shepards from the sheep. I think it is safe to believe they have every intention to continue tightening the screws to prevent exchange of ideas and interfere with free speech and not just over the Internet. So, in the spirit of the patriots who were responsible for founding this nation, it may be time to take the movement underground and begin generating code-words for instructional exchanges in the very near future.

    Don’t allow this committee to label you because you don’t agree. Speaking your mind and sharing different solutions to perceived problems caused by changing government policies do not make one a domestic terrorist. Our problems are not with the founding documents, our problems stem from corrupt elected and appointed officials, their support staffs, and influence peddlers. With this latest attack on free speech it would appear the left wants to seize power, permanently, and that they are willing to stamp out “dissent” in order to do so. What makes this so disturbing is that i have heard precisely nothing about this from republican politicians. This defenning silence leads to the conclusion that both parties are complicit in the attacks on our civil liberties and rights, or no one is watching the foxes in the henhouse. Either way, the objective described in the report above brings this administration one step closer to spring the trip-wire that launches this nation into a shooting rebellion by its citizens.

Leave a Reply