Obama Eligibility Appealed In Judge Roy Moore’s Court

judge-roy-moore-220x220While many believe the “birthers” are “right wing extremists,” there is much evidence that demonstrates that Barack Hussein Obama is not only ineligible for office, but that he is knowingly a usurper to the highest office in the land. The Obama eligibility case is likely to be heard in a court room by a judge who questions Obama’s eligibility. Judge Roy Moore was elected chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court last November, a decade after he defied a federal order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the state Supreme Court building. Attorney Larry Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch and now the head of Freedom Watch, is appealing to Moore’s court after the Montgomery Circuit Court dismissed the Obama eligibility case.

WND reports,

2012 Constitution Party presidential nominee Virgil Goode and Alabama Republican Party leader Hugh McInnish are asking the state’s highest court to force Secretary of State Beth Chapman to verify that all candidates on the state’s 2012 ballot were eligible to serve.

“We are hopeful that Chief Justice Moore and the rest of the jurists on the Alabama Supreme Court will follow the law,” Klayman told WND.

Klayman says he and his team “have great respect for Chief Justice Moore and his integrity and legal acumen.”

“He is one courageous and brave man. There are few in this country.”

The case is an appeal of a dismissal by the Montgomery Circuit Court.

In his brief, Klayman says “credible evidence and information from an official source” was presented to Chapman before the election indicating Obama might not have been qualified for Oval Office.

The complaint argues Chapman failed her constitutional duty as secretary of state to verify the eligibility of candidates.

Last year, Moore defended Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin who was court-martialed, imprisoned, and stripped of all military rank and privileges because he refused to obey deployment orders, arguing that Obama had not documented his eligibility under Article 2, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.

Moore said Lakin “not only has a right to follow his personal convictions under the Constitution, he has a duty.”

“And if the authority running the efforts of the war is not a citizen in violation of the Constitution, the order is unlawful,” he said.

Klayman said that a refusal by Chapman to investigate the qualifications of candidates for president has resulted in “a person believed to be unqualified for that office” having been “elected.”

Following Obama’s taking the office for a second term in November, Judge Moore declared that Obama violated the Constitution by bombing Libya. He said, “No president has the power to violate constitutional restraints of power,” Moore said.

“The Constitution is the rule of law, and [my job is] to uphold the rule of law.”

“There is little regard for the Constitution in the courts today, even the U.S. Supreme Court.”

Not only has there been the fake birth certificate, which Obama’s own attorney admitted was fraudulent, but even Barack and Michelle Obama, along with the Kenyan Ambassador Peter Ogego, have all said that Obama was either born in Kenya or referred to Kenya as “his homeland.”Sheriff Joe Arpaio brought additional evidence and claimed this is a national security issue. Lord Monckton called Obama an illegal president after demonstrating the fraudulent nature of the birth certificate and even Israeli Science claims that Obama’s birth certificate is a fake. Apparently so is Obama’s selective service card and his social security number.

In case you are skeptical, you should go back and read the Kenyan Parliament’s own minutes on November 5, 2008, where they openly stated,

“Mr. Obama, is a son of the soil of this country (Kenya). Every other country in this continent is celebrating the Obama win. It is only proper and fitting that the country which he originates should show the same excitement, pomp and colour.”

This statement was followed by the Deputy Speaker warning the member who just made the statement,

“You had better be very careful where you transgress between watching your own sovereignty and what can be interpreted in some quarters as some form of treason.”

The real smoking gun?  The Kenyan birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama

The real smoking gun? The Kenyan birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama

You can go here and retrieve the November 5, 2008 document at the Kenyan Parliament website (or get the highlighted version on our site indicating important points provided by Lorri Anderson), along with the one from March 25, 2010(or get the highlighted version on our website indicating important sections provided by Lorri Anderson).

Several courts have listened to the Obama eligibility case, but rejected it. Even the U.S. Supreme Court was entertaining a request to move to oral arguments concerning Obama’s eligibility. Should the case get before Judge Roy Moore we should be able to at least have a decent hearing of the facts of the matter and a reasonable ruling. Freedom Outpost’s Publius Huldah has put forth exactly what the Founders intended in regards to being a natural born citizen and how it relates to the Constitution.

The video below walks you through the Kenyan Parliament’s documentation and much more:

YouTube Preview Image

Tim Brown is the Editor of Freedom Outpost and a regular contributor to The D.C. Clothesline. For the latest conservative news please visit Freedom Outpost now.

Don't forget to follow the D.C. Clothesline on Facebook and Twitter. PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

39 Responses to Obama Eligibility Appealed In Judge Roy Moore’s Court

  1. Pingback: Alabama Supreme Court Passes the Buck, Rules "No Opinion" in Obama Eligibility Case |

  2. Montana says:

    Poor little Birthers they are haters not debaters. In my opinion this is what the small portions of the republican party of “birthers, baggers and blowhards” have brought you. They are good at “Follow the Leader” of their dullard leaders, they listen to Beck, Hedgecock, Hannity, O’Reilly, Rush and Savage (don’t you get tired being lied to) and the rest of the Blowhards. Are you surprise at what they do when you know what they think? The world is complicated and most republicans (Hamiliton, Lincoln, Roosevelt) believe that we should use government a little to increase social mobility, now its about dancing around the claim of government is the problem. The sainted Reagan passed the biggest tax increase in American history and as a result federal employment increased, but facts are lost when mired in mysticism and superstition. Although some republicans are trying to distant themselves from this fringe most of them are just going along and fanning the flames. Lets face it the Republicans had 8 years to deal with health care, immigration and financial oversight and governance and they failed. They could not even win one of the two wars they started, the body bags are still coming in. The Republicans wanted to give Obama his Waterloo defeat over healthcare and this last presidential election but instead they gave themselves their own Waterloo defeat by not participating in the debate of ideas and by becoming little, as the party of obstructionist. But they now claim they have changed, come on, what sucker is going to believe that Rubio, Paul, Cruz and Ryan are anything but losers? But maybe thats all you have.

  3. smrstrauss says:

    Re “war”: The last time birthers held a meeting, Orly’s protest rally at the Inauguration, about three people showed up. Not three thousand, not three hundred, about three.

    Obama’s Selective Service card was indeed forged. It was forged by the fellow who put it online, who did not even claim to have gotten it from Obama or from any representative of Obama.

    Obama’s birth certificate is not forged. Only birther “experts” have called it forged, and they have not shown that they are even experts, much less fair and impartial. Those are two reasons why they are not believed by Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck or the National Review (or by Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan or Gingrich or Santorum or Huckabee).

    One proof that Obama’s birth certificate is not forged is Obama’s short-form birth certificate.

    Short-form birth certificates are created by a clerk reading the information from the document in the file, and filling out the computer form that generates the printed short-form birth certificate. The officials in Hawaii have confirmed that they sent a short-form to Obama. So, unless they are lying—and they were Republican officials–the only way that Obama’s birth certificate could have been forged was that it was forged in 2007 and slipped into the file just before the clerk looked at the file. That is not very likely, is it? And it is especially unlikely since at the time Obama was not even the candidate of the Democrats. He was still in the primaries at the time, and he was only a junior senator from Illinois.

    And birther sites have not shown you these real experts:

    Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

    Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

    John Woodman, independent computer professional, who is a member of the Tea Party (who says that he hates Obama’s policies but found no evidence of forgery) said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

    Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily:“All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it.

    Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery.“I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said.

    Birthers’ claim that Obama’s birth certificate is false is well understood to be caused by their own motives—they hate Obama and would like to harm him.

  4. Veteran says:

    In case no one knows there is a woman who also is leading this issue to have him impeached and thrown out based on several fraudulent documents, e.g. ss number which belongs to someone else, selective service registration, and a host of others. He must be removed by force because the justice system is failing in everyway. I only hope that justice Moore stands up to this moron and takes action. This woman and Klayman have been fighting this for to long and needs to be addressed because this A$$hole is ruining our country exponentially. I say he resigns or prepare for a war!!
    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/
    Klayman and this woman needs to be supported!!

  5. B. Steadman says:

    Barack Obama was born August 4, 1961 at the Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya and not in Hawaii as he claims. Lucas Daniel Smith obtained a certified copy of Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate directly from the birth hospital on February 19, 2009. A copy of this authentic, historic document and also copies of other valuable information items are available for FREE download at: WasObamaBornInKenya (DOT) com

    • smrstrauss says:

      The “born in Kenya” story is the height of the loony side of the birther movement. It is based on forgeries like that of Lucas D. Smith, and falsifications–such as the claim that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya—when she actually said right on the same tape that he was born IN HAWAII, and she said in another interview that the first that her family in Kenya had heard of Obama’s birth was in a letter FROM HAWAII.

      Lucas D. Smith, a convicted felon, claimed that he went to Kenya and got Obama’s birth certificate at a hospital in Mombasa. But Lucas D. Smith has constantly refused to show proof that he, Smith, had ever gone to Kenya. All that he would have to do would be to show a Kenya stamp on a page of a passport, but Lucas D. Smith has refused to do that, constantly, and he has also constantly refused to say why he will not show that proof. (Moreover, his “birth certificate” uses US date formats [month/day/year] and not the day/month/year format used in Kenya.)

      Laying aside for a moment the overwhelming proof that Obama was born in Hawaii, the evidence that Obama was NOT born in Kenya is also very strong. There were a grand total of 21 people who came to the USA from Kenya in 1961. Of these only seven were US citizens. And the birther myth has always been that Obama’s parents went there and returned by plane, but only one person came to the USA from Kenya in 1961 by plane and that person was, wait for it, NOT a US citizen. And Obama’s father did not go to Kenya in 1961 either (making it unlikely that his mother did, since travel late in pregnancy was rare, and even more rare without the husband going along). WND has proved with a FOI Act request that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961.

      And the Kenyan government investigated the “born in Kenya” story, and found that it was not true.

      “Jon Chessoni, a first secretary at the Kenyan Embassy in Washington, can’t understand why his office gets so many baseless questions about whether Barack Obama was born in Kenya.

      “It’s madness,” said Chessoni on Monday.“His father, in 1961, would not even have been in Kenya. When this matter first came up, the Kenyan government did its research and confirmed that these are all baseless claims.””

      http://washingtonindependent.com/53654/forged

      Obama has a Hawaii birth certificate that says that he was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital, and the officials of both parties in Hawaii have confirmed that fact. It is also confirmed by the birth announcement in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961, which were sent to the papers only by the DOH of Hawaii.

      Obama’s birth announcement appeared in a section of the newspapers called Health Bureau Statistics. As the name indicates, and as the papers and the DOH also say, ONLY the DOH of Hawaii could send birth notices to the Health Bureau Statistics section of the paper. And the DOH only sent out those notices for children that it had issued birth certificates for, and in 1961 the DOH was not allowed to register the births of children who were not born in Hawaii.

  6. Brian Page says:

    There is one problem with this. Even if his birth certificate is a forgery, he is still considered a natural born American citizen because his mother is/was an American citizen. If you look up the conditions that certify anyone as a “natural born” citizen, you can verify this for yourself. I think it’s time we focus on impeaching him for his multitude of other known offenses for which we have solid proof and a strong legal argument, rather than dwell on the authenticity of his birth certificate.

    • Rick says:

      The other problem is that we don’t have congress criters with the guts to file impeachment charges on him. It’s like they are a pair of shoes, left and right, worn by the same person. We have a bunch of “keyboard commando’s” that say a bunch of stuff, but how many has held their elected critters feet to the fire. Called them to discuss an up coming vote. Myself, I don’t want to have to give up on the first two boxes and have to resort to the third box……

    • CA Warrior says:

      Brian, you are close, but I think you are referring to a “native citizen”.

      Think of it this way: someone born to two citizen parents in their home country needs no law to declare his/her status. These are truly Natural Born Citizens. Someone like obama that has a father who was never a US citizen (native Kenyan) can be considered a native citizen through the 14th Amendment, but he can NEVER be a NBC.

      • Ellen1 says:

        HOWEVER, since the meaning of Natural Born Citizen comes from the common law (not from Vattel, whose words were not translated as Natural Born Citizen until ten years after the US Constitution was written), and since the meaning in the common law refers to the PLACE of birth, then every child born in the USA (yes including anchor babies) is a Natural Born Citizen except for the children of foreign diplomats. See the Meese quotation above. Obama, btw, was born in the USA, in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital, as his birth certificate and the confirmation of the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii, and the public Index Data file and the birth notices sent to the newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 all show.

  7. bunniehopkins says:

    So you want biden to be potus?

  8. zach says:

    Get him out of here then lets get on with the Elections that coming soon and Clean House, Obama has slapped every True American in the Face everytime he wipes his ass with our Constitution, Hopefully somebody had the guts to get him out of here !!!

  9. shannon s says:

    This has been going on forever and nothing ever comes of it, our system protects this jackass

  10. happy squirrel says:

    Something has to happen. Americans have to fight for what we believe in. This is OUR America. Our ancestors fought for our freedom and we don’t need to let this imposter take it away :(

  11. Zach says:

    I think we are coming to End Times ??? unless something Major happens and gets Abomanation out of America !!!!

  12. G.B. says:

    If he is eligible for office then impeach him. If he’s uneligible for office then arrest him. Either way he needs to be removed promptly. I’ve never seen someone who is so anti American and corrupt, yet every day the American people have to wake up knowing this criminal-0bama is in charge of our country & working to destroy it!

  13. Jim Foster says:

    The problem is, his mother was an American citizen. Therefore, he is an American citizen by birth. Where he was actually born is a moot point. Were this not the case, then the children born of American sercice men and women stationed abroad would not be citizens either. My personal beleif, is the fact that the whole “birther” thing is exactly the same as the blatant voter fraud that occured as well. The popular election has NOTHING to do with electing the POTUS, it’s the electoral college. Both of these apparent travesties of justice (to which there is no obvious real point) have been allowed to go on and on. The REAL question is “To what end”? WHY have these smoke and mirror tactics gone unchecked? I believe there to be a much, much more sinister objective. The further division of the American people.

    • freedom1775 says:

      Jim I think your wrong it says that both of your parents have to be us citizens . Obummers father was not .

      • gary says:

        I married an English girl our daughter was born in England an she was considered American

      • smrstrauss says:

        There is nothing in the US Constitution about parents, and the meaning of Natural Born Citizen comes from the common law and refers to the PLACE of birth.

        “Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are “natural born citizens” and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are “natural born citizens” eligible to serve as President …”—- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

    • CA Warrior says:

      Jim, PLEASE read Art II Sect I of the Constitution about the requirements to hold the office of President. ‘Natural Born Citizen” That means born in the country of citizen parents. obama does not qualify in any way shape or form.

      The argument that ‘he is a citizen and is eligible’ does not hold water. Don’t believe me?

      Read the requirements for US Senator, and you will see “citizen’. Now ask yourself and EVERYONE around you WHY the framers of our Constitution differentiated between citizen and Natural Born Citizen. Answer: They knew that such a high office required the presence of a single allegiance to our country.

      Remember that the 14th Amendment offers law to solve the circumstances of obama. With one citizen parent, and place of birth in question, he may be a 14th Amendment citizen but he can NEVER be a NBC!

      • Donald B. Crane says:

        Very, very well stated. More people need to learn the difference between a citizen and a natural born citizen.

        • smrstrauss says:

          The difference between an ordinary citizen and a natural born citizen is that ordinary citizens include naturalized citizens while natural born citizens do not. That is the only difference. And, ALL citizens born on US soil are Natural Born Citizens regardless of the citizenship of one or even two parents, because the original meaning of Natural Born Citizen comes from the common law and refers to the place of birth.

      • Jim Foster says:

        As a 14th amendment citizen, he IS a natural born citizen. Please reread my post. This is EXACTLY what I was talking about. Smoke and mirrors to distract us from what’s going on. Just like he did with the Monsanto Protection Act!

        • CA Warrior says:

          Jim,

          The 14th amendment was written to cover those who cannot be Natural Born Citizens, that is, born in the country of citizen parents. Yes, obama may be a citizen but not a NBC. His father was never an American Citizen. obama has dual allegiance, US and Kenya.

          Now please read Vattel’s Law of Nations, the document relied on by the framers of our Constitution. You will see language similar to what I posted above.

          Also please refer to the US Supreme Court decision: Minor v. Happersett. This specifically declares what I have posted above.

          Rmember, the 14th amendment establishes citizenship for those who cannot be Natural Born Citizens.

          • smrstrauss says:

            Vattel’s Law of Nations was relied upon by the writers of the US Constitution for International Law, but they read a lot of other things besides Vattel. In particular, they read Blackstone, and he defined Natural Born as coming from the common law and referring to the place of birth, and the quotations from AMERICANS (not Swiss) at the time indicates that they used the Blackstone definition and not the Vattel definition. Some examples:

            “Prior to the adoption of the constitution, the people inhabiting the different states might be divided into two classes: natural born citizens, or those born within the state, and aliens, or such as were born out of it. The first, by their birth-right, became entitled to all the privileges of citizens; the second, were entitled to none, but such as were held out and given by the laws of the respective states prior to their emigration. …St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE’S COMMENTARIES: WITH NOTES OF REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. (1803)

            “Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity.”—William Rawle, A VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2d ed. (1829)

            Both of these men were familiar with the writers of the US Constitution. And, as you can see, both of them use Natural Born Citizen to refer only to the place of birth.

        • CA Warrior says:

          And also consider this: an illegal or fraudulent president CANNOT be impeached. He is not considered a sitting president so articles of impeachment cannot be used.

          obama is a usurper, a criminal, and must be arrested and removed immediately. And those who refuse to do this or stand in the way of others who seek to remove obama are just as culpable as obama himself.

      • smrstrauss says:

        No, the original meaning of Natural Born Citizen simply means born in the country, as the quotation from the Heritage Guide to the Constitution above makes clear. That’s why Rubio and Jindal, and, yes, Obama, are all Natural Born US Citizens.

        http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/31/is-rubio-eligible/

        http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012

    • Dennis Kolb Sr. says:

      I found Historical Documented Proof of What, the Framer’s of Our Constitution had in their possion of, while Drafting Our Constitution, That With Obama’s Father Being of Kenya Citizenship, at the Time of Obama’s Birth, No Matter If He Was Born In The Whitehouse Today, Obama nor Anyone Else Who’s Father is A Citizen of Any Other Country, At The Time of Their Birth, CAN-NOT Be Considered A Natural-Born Citizen! Therefore, Obama Is Not A Natural Born Citizen of The United States! And That According to Constitutional-Law, as Vattel’s Work was What The Framers Relied On and Used, On Who Is To Become, or Qualify As, ‘A Natural-Born Citizen’ :
      What Did Our Framers mean by “natural born Citizen”?
      Our Framers had no need to define “natural born Citizen” in the Constitution, because by the time of the Federal Convention of 1787, a formal definition of the term consistent with the new republican principles1 already existed in Emer Vattel’s classic, Law of Nations.
      And we know that our Framers carefully studied and relied upon Vattel’s work. I’ll prove it.

      How Vattel’s Law of Nations got to the Colonies, and its Influence Here:
      During 1775, Charles Dumas, an ardent republican [as opposed to a monarchist] living in Europe sent three copies of Vattel’s Law of Nations to Benjamin Franklin. Here is a portion of Franklin’s letter of Dec. 9, 1775 thanking Dumas for the books:

      “… I am much obliged by the kind present you have made us of your edition of Vattel. It came to us in good season, when the circumstances of a rising state make it necessary frequently to consult the law of nations. Accordingly that copy, which I kept, (after depositing one in our own public library here, and sending the other to the College of Massachusetts Bay, as you directed,) has been continually in the hands of the members of our Congress, now sitting, who are much pleased with your notes and preface, and have entertained a high and just esteem for their author…”

      Vattel on “natural born citizens”, “inhabitants”, and “naturalized citizens”:
      From our beginning, we were subjects of the British Crown. With the War for Independence, we became citizens.1 [READ this footnote!] We needed new concepts to fit our new status as citizens. Vattel provided these new republican concepts of “citizenship”. The gist of what Vattel says in Law of Nations, Book I, Ch. XIX, at §§ 212-217, is this:
      § 212: Natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens – it is necessary that they be born of a father who is a citizen. If a person is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.
      § 213: Inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners who are permitted to stay in the country. They are subject to the laws of the country while they reside in it. But they do not participate in all the rights of citizens – they enjoy only the advantages which the law or custom gives them. Their children follow the condition of their fathers – they too are inhabitants.
      § 214: A country may grant to a foreigner the quality of citizen – this is naturalization. In some countries, the sovereign cannot grant to a foreigner all the rights of citizens, such as that of holding public office – this is a regulation of the fundamental law. And in England, merely being born in the country naturalizes the children of a foreigner.
      §§ 215, 216 & 217: Children born of citizens in a foreign country, at sea, or while overseas in the service of their country, are “citizens”. By the law of nature alone, children follow the condition of their fathers; the place of birth produces no change in this particular.
      Do you see? The republican concept of “natural born citizenship” is radically different from the feudal notion of “natural born subjectship.” Under feudalism, merely being born in the domains of the King made one – by birth – a “natural born subject”. But in Vattel’s Model and Our Constitutional Republic, Citizens are “natural born” only if they are born of Citizens.

      • smrstrauss says:

        The meaning of Natural Born Citizen certainly did not come from Vattel, whose French word “indignes” was not translated into “Natural Born Citizen” until ten years after the Constitution was written and who was not even mentioned once in the Federalist Papers. And the evidence of the AMERICAN writers (Vattel was Swiss) at the time is that they always used the phrase Natural Born Citizen the way that it was used in the common law and never used it to refer to parents.

  14. Angie says:

    Jimmy, if he’s a usurper, he cannot be impeached. He must first legally hold the office. As a usurper, he’s never legally held office. Those who demand his impeachment are asking to set one of the worst legal precedents in our history: Any constitutionally ineligible thug can come along and buy his way into the White House. We’ll just impeach him later! Also, to impeach him would allow every piece of legislation he’s signed into law to remain.

    • John says:

      Look up the definition of usurper. He has committed treason which is punishable by death.

      • We can only “hope” for this “change”.

      • GAIL says:

        JUST GET HIM THE HELL OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE AND BACK TO KENYA WHERE HE BELONGS!!!!!!

        • Ellen1 says:

          The “born in Kenya” story is the height of the loony side of the birther movement. It is based on forgeries like that of Lucas D. Smith, and falsifications–such as the claim that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya—when she actually said right on the same tape that he was born IN HAWAII, and she said in another interview that the first that her family in Kenya had heard of Obama’s birth was in a letter FROM HAWAII.

          Lucas D. Smith, a convicted felon, claimed that he went to Kenya and got Obama’s birth certificate at a hospital in Mombasa. But Lucas D. Smith has constantly refused to show proof that he, Smith, had ever gone to Kenya. All that he would have to do would be to show a Kenya stamp on a page of a passport, but Lucas D. Smith has refused to do that, constantly, and he has also constantly refused to say why he will not show that proof. (Moreover, his “birth certificate” uses US date formats [month/day/year] and not the day/month/year format used in Kenya.)

          Laying aside for a moment the overwhelming proof that Obama was born in Hawaii, the evidence that Obama was NOT born in Kenya is also very strong. There were a grand total of 21 people who came to the USA from Kenya in 1961. Of these only seven were US citizens. And the birther myth has always been that Obama’s parents went there and returned by plane, but only one person came to the USA from Kenya in 1961 by plane and that person was, wait for it, NOT a US citizen. And Obama’s father did not go to Kenya in 1961 either (making it unlikely that his mother did, since travel late in pregnancy was rare, and even more rare without the husband going along). WND has proved with a FOI Act request that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961.

          And the Kenyan government investigated the “born in Kenya” story, and found that it was not true.

          “Jon Chessoni, a first secretary at the Kenyan Embassy in Washington, can’t understand why his office gets so many baseless questions about whether Barack Obama was born in Kenya.

          “It’s madness,” said Chessoni on Monday.“His father, in 1961, would not even have been in Kenya. When this matter first came up, the Kenyan government did its research and confirmed that these are all baseless claims.””

          http://washingtonindependent.com/53654/forged

          Obama has a Hawaii birth certificate that says that he was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital, and the officials of both parties in Hawaii have confirmed that fact. It is also confirmed by the birth announcement in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961, which were sent to the papers only by the DOH of Hawaii.

          Obama’s birth announcement appeared in a section of the newspapers called Health Bureau Statistics. As the name indicates, and as the papers and the DOH also say, ONLY the DOH of Hawaii could send birth notices to the Health Bureau Statistics section of the paper. And the DOH only sent out those notices for children that it had issued birth certificates for, and in 1961 the DOH was not allowed to register the births of children who were not born in Hawaii.

          Oh, and there is this:

          http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2011/04/kapiol

    • I agree & have been saying this for some time, however not many are willing to listen.

    • smrstrauss says:

      Obama is not an usurper. He really was born in Hawaii (as has been shown overwhelmingly). And the meaning of Natural Born Citizen comes from the common law, and the original meaning refers to the place of birth. Thus ALL children born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats are Natural Born US Citizens.

      “Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are “natural born citizens” and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are “natural born citizens” eligible to serve as President …”—- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

  15. Well let’s impeach the idiot and send him home. I actually meant prison along with his wife, Hillary Clinton,frankenstein,holder and many more.

Leave a Reply