The Butcher of Benghazi… Leaked Libyan Intelligence Documents Implicate Morsi

morsi-allahu-ackbarOur government has sent Egypt over 1.5 billion dollars in aid in 2013 alone. That does not include the F-16s and tanks. What would you say if it were proven that Morsi was responsible for the attack on Benghazi? Would that qualify as aiding the enemy? Would that qualify as treason?

Some new evidence surfaced on Wednesday that sheds further light on Mohamed Morsi as the likely mastermind of the Benghazi attack that left four Americans dead. I will get to that evidence in a moment but I quickly want to summarize the evidence that we have previously reported.

On June 3rd I reported that an Egyptian Journalist has linked Morsi to Benghazi through the translation of a YouTube video that was taken at the scene. Her assessment was that the terrorists were speaking in an Egyptian dialect of Arabic and she quoted one of the terrorists as saying, “Don’t shoot. Don’t shoot. Dr. Morsi sent us.” This gave us reasonable suspicion to think that the orders could have come from Morsi.

On June 9th Steven Ahle shed light on the possibility that Morsi’s orders may have been for the kidnapping of Ambassador Stevens. He cited the fact that Abdallah Dhu-al-Bajadin, an Al Qaeda weapons expert, claims that it was a case of a foiled kidnapping and that Ambassador Stevens’ cause of death was lethal injection. Was Ambassador Stevens supposed to be the collateral used in the exchange for “The Blind Sheik?” That story has been reported for months and months (the prisoner exchange) but the new evidence we are seeing would seem to support it fully. Morsi has been the missing link to hold that story together.

Also on June 9th I reported that John Kerry authorized 1.3 billion dollars in aid to Egypt and waived a number of democratic conditions that are supposed to be met in order to release that aid.

On June 13th Pamela Geller reported that Magdi Ahmad Hussein had a “hot mic” moment in a meeting with Morsi and many of his top advisors. He stated that America and Israel are the enemies of Egypt. He did not realize, until after his comments, that the meeting was being aired LIVE on state television.

On June 23rd Pamela Geller reported that the US is sending troops to Egypt to assist in putting down the “Anti-Muslim Brotherhood Riots.” Of particular note is that these troops are being sent for “the possibility of protecting the country’s border with Israel.” I found that statement more than a bit peculiar.

That brings us to June 26th (yesterday) when Libyan Intelligence documents were leaked to a Kuwaiti news source and started making the rounds throughout the Arab World. Unless you follow certain sites in the states it is highly unlikely that you have heard about this. This is courtesy of Raymond Ibrahim who makes it his business to translate Arabic:


This is a thumbnail of the Libyan Intelligence document that was leaked. Courtesy of  Raymond Ibrahim.

According to a Libyan intelligence document, the Muslim Brotherhood, including Egyptian President Morsi, were involved in the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, where several Americans, including U.S. ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, were killed.

Wednesday, June 26, several Arabic websites, including Veto Gate, quoted the intelligence report, which apparently was first leaked to the Kuwaiti paper, Al Ra’i.  Prepared by Mahmoud Ibrahim Sharif, Director of National Security for Libya, the report is addressed to the nation’s Minister of Interior.

It discusses the preliminary findings of the investigation, specifically concerning an “Egyptian cell” which was involved in the consulate attack. “Based on confessions derived from some of those arrested at the scene” six people, “all of them Egyptians” from the jihad group Ansar al-Sharia (“Supporters of Islamic Law), were arrested.

According to the report, during interrogations, these Egyptian jihadi cell members “confessed to very serious and important information concerning the financial sources of the group and the planners of the event and the storming and burning of the U.S. consulate in Benghazi…. And among the more prominent figures whose names were mentioned by cell members during confessions were: Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi; preacher Safwat Hegazi; Saudi businessman Mansour Kadasa, owner of the satellite station, Al-Nas; Egyptian Sheikh Muhammad Hassan; former presidential candidate, Hazim Salih Abu Isma’il…”

I think it is time for America to announce that Mohamed Morsi is a suspect and the potential mastermind behind Benghazi. I am not sure how much more evidence we need to at least name him as a suspect.

However, I think this story may go much deeper than that. If Morsi was involved as the orchestrator or financier you had better believe that our government already knows that this is the case. If those Libyan Intelligence documents are valid I would suspect that this information was already shared with our State Department.

So why did John Kerry release that funding while “waiving” the conditions? Doesn’t it seem a bit odd to release 1.3 Billion Dollars to a country that is not meeting the requirement for that aid? Could Morsi have leverage?

My opinion is that Morsi is a legitimate suspect and that our federal government knows it. Obama knows it. Kerry knows it. They may already have proof. That is my opinion.

So the real question is this… Why are they trying to cover for him? Is it possible that Morsi’s orders came from us? God help us all if they did.

If you can not see Mohamed Morsi as a possible suspect at this point then you are hopeless. This is coming from a variety of sources and unless it is an orchestrated set up I would assume that much of it is true.

I would think our government would be all over it. If they could implicate Morsi for this then it would take a certain amount of pressure off of Clinton, Obama and now Kerry. Don’t tell me that they would not willingly throw any man, guilty or innocent, under the bus to save their own hides. Yet they aren’t even acknowledging the possibility. Why?

Since they are not trying to do that it makes me believe that they are complicit in this.  It makes me believe that if they point to Morsi then the Egyptian leader might have something to say about OUR involvement as well. You might call it honor amongst thieves, or in this case murderers.

I have arrived at the general conclusion that Morsi is a strong suspect as the orchestrator/financier of the Benghazi attack. I must also suspect our government of being complicit since they have given us no reason to believe otherwise.

If this is the case then the most likely scenario is that Obama authorized the kidnapping so that he would have an excuse to release Omar Abdel Rahman, “The Blind Sheik,” from a life sentence that he currently serves. For those who are unaware The B.S. was born in Egypt.

We all know they are covering something. Could it be that Morsi ordered this attack and our government had complete prior knowledge that he would do so?

Let’s not forget that Stevens was ordered to go to Benghazi by Clinton. Is this why? Was he set up by his own government?

Nothing would surprise me at this point.

The problem is that we the American people don’t know if we can trust anyone representing us. A lot of the questions that should be asked are not being asked.

Here’s a good example. Why is it that none of our congressional leaders seem to be questioning the probability that we hired Al Qaeda to defend the diplomatic mission in Benghazi? How many Americans even know this story? If this ends up being fact that one piece of evidence is enough to try both Clinton and Obama for treason. Are you also aware that the February 17th Martyrs Brigade officially disbanded just hours after the attack? A few days before the attack they announced that they would no longer be providing security. How convenient.

Internet rumors are circulating that General Ham revealed nothing of  real value in his testimony on Wednesday. If that ends up being true then it would not surprise any of us.

The real question is if we can trust any of the people who are supposed to be asking the questions on our behalf. Do they know not to ask certain questions and to avoid certain subjects? Are the hearings a sham to placate us while the real intent is to find no evidence of wrong doing whatsoever? I am starting to think it’s possible.

So for now our hopes are riding somewhat on media sources from the Arab world. I wouldn’t say that is the best position we could possibly be in but it is all we have at this point.

Morsi is more than a suspect. He is a strong suspect. Watch how the government reacts and that will tell you how badly they want to protect him. These stories are starting to leak out and eventually they will have to answer for what is being reported about Morsi.

Is he “The Butcher of Benghazi?”

My opinion is that the pieces have fallen together and Benghazi has been blown wide open. You probably won’t get that story on CNN  but take all of the facts we have and look how they fit together.

Obama agreed to send the Blind Sheik home but he needed Stevens to make it look like a valid prisoner exchange. He made a deal to set it up. It blew up in his face and now we see our congressional leaders chasing their tails like puppy dogs while conveniently avoiding the important questions. The truth lies in Morsi’s involvement and our government’s obvious efforts to protect him. I would be shocked if this is not the real story. Though we may never actually know.

I believe that it was more than a case of negligence by our government. I believe they share guilt in the murder of four Americans. I believe they set it up.

What do you think?


Don't forget to follow the D.C. Clothesline on Facebook and Twitter. PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.

About Dean Garrison

Keep it simple. I believe in God, Family and Country (in that order). My articles can be freely reproduced in full, or in part, so long as you credit me as the author and provide some sort of link to Send me a Friend Request on Facebook
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

43 Responses to The Butcher of Benghazi… Leaked Libyan Intelligence Documents Implicate Morsi

  1. homosaps says:

    A plausible scenario. The State Department also ordered weapons stored at another location at the station, an emergency evacuation vehicle went missing that day and a Quick Reaction Force was told to stand down for a rescue effort. Now we have Hillary lying about not knowing that guns were being run from Benghazi to Al-Qaeda in Syria. Right. Hillary also lied about the supposed anti-Islam film as being the cause of the incident. Hillary also lied about not receiving urgent requests to increase security for the station in a war zone. She almost certainly is lying when the State Dept denies it issued a stand down order to the Reaction Force. Continued lying from a psychopath. Hillary belongs in a jail cell.

  2. e1313ruth says:

    Did not Morsi visit the white house and request the release of the blind sheik prior..????? I thought Obama and Morsi conjured up the kidnapping…

  3. topcat1957 says:

    A retired admiral made part of this connection shortly after the attack on the outpost. He claimed that the stand down order was issued to enable the kidnapping of Stevens to occur without incident. The admiral said Obama planned to exchange the Blind Sheikh for the ambassador, showing himself to be a master negotiator and hero to the nation just prior to the 2012 election. This would also be a gift to his buddies in the Muslim Brotherhood. However, when the two ex-SEALs saw that the ambassador was in danger they engaged the attackers, killing a great number of them. Feeling betrayed by the Obama administration, the attackers proceeded to anally rape Ambassador Stevens and then beat him to death. They also eventually killed the two SEALs and another American.

    This plan constitutes treason by Obama. He is presently doing his all to distract the American public’s attention from the Benghazi scandal, in the hopes that the investigation can be derailed more easily without public attention.

  4. This Story makes all the LIES. that this CORRUPT ADMINISTRATION spewed out in the days that followed the Benghazi Brotherhoods intentional attack on the CIA OUTPOST,more easily understood.
    They are Disheartening,DISGUSTING FACTS.

    They should worry us all-
    @ABC @CBS @NBC @CNN @msnbc

  5. Ted says:

    ASHAME that the Senate is control by Democrats. And what is so dangerous and so wrong is that the American people are not getting all the truth from main stream media !

    If You Control The Media You Control The World !!!!!!!!

  6. Ted says:

    Just sit back and think of all things that Obama has done to dismantle the United States……no respect for God and Our Constitution……extremely very sad ! ! ! Cannot be impeached !!!!!!!!!!

  7. 317david says:

    I think we all know what is going down in our country(US) so when is the idiot commie going to get IMPEACHED. He has all ready done enough for that, so what’s going on, all I ever see going down is talk, so do something!!!!! The only thing that is worth reading is IMPEACHMENT NOW! Do something now!!!!!!!!

  8. d4Texas says:

    It would seem to fit in perfectly with the Obama-Morsi friendship for the following to have happened in the Aug-Oct 2012 or before time frame:
    From: M. D. McGranahan
    This is not disturbing … it is infuriating, far and beyond words, and from the beginning stunk, like rotting fish!!!!!
    I received this message yesterday. IF this proves to be true, it is impeachable grounds. It also may help explain why Petreaus was forced out a few days before the Benghazi hearings coming up. It explains a lot of behavior by Obama and his administration – the pulled security, the “stand down” orders, and blaming that stupid video. The fireworks are coming. It will be the first of many disasters ahead. Please share.

    My brother-in-law (a rabid Obama supporter) posted this on Facebook:
    According to sources in the State Department and the CIA, and intercepted communications from the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama “staged” the attack in Benghazi in order to create a monumental “October Surprise” that would guarantee him re-election.

    Muslim Brotherhood appointees within the obama adminstration:
    Arif Alikhan – Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
    Mohammed Elibiary – Homeland Security Adviser
    Rashad Hussain – Special Envoy to the (OIC) Organization of the Islamic Conference
    Salam al-Marayati – Obama Adviser – founder Muslim Public Affairs Council and its current Executive Director
    Imam Mohamed Magid – Obama’s Sharia Czar – Islamic Society of North America
    Eboo Patel – Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships

    Why is the Muslim Brotherhood in positions with so much influence – in our “Homeland Security of all places?”

    Yes, you read that right, and no, I’m not making this up. Obama, we now know, is and has been working with the Muslim Brotherhood secretly to engineer the release of the “Blind Sheik,” Omar Abdel Rahman, the mastermind behind the 1993 World Trade Center attack.

    In Obama’s October Surprise, he intentionally set up the consulate to have no security months in advance so that Chris Stevens could be kidnapped, and held for ransom by Al-Qaeda (and the Muslim Brotherhood). Then, several days before the election, the plan was to trade Chris Stevens for the Blind Sheik, making himself look like a hero, and all but guaranteeing re-election.

    This was one of the top reasons why Obama was so insistent on the Muslim Brotherhood getting $1.2 Billion in U.S. Aid. They were to have a primary role in getting Obama re-elected. That is why, even though they knew days before the attack that it was going to occur, no effort was made to bolster security. It was intended to be non-existent. The Libyan security forces were intended to quietly slip into the night when the attack began. And they did, just as planned. That is why, even though 2 C-130U gunships, which were built SPECIFICALLY for this kind of attack, and which could have saved the lives of our people there and were a mere 45 minutes away, were never scrambled at any time during the attack.

    There was to be no resistance whatsoever. That is why there were not one, but TWO armed drones flying over the consulate during the conflagration… our CIA operatives on the ground were painting targets because they knew air cover was available. That is why, even though requesting support and backup three times, their requests were NOT ignored, but were intentionally, specifically DENIED three times, and they were told to “stand down,” which basically means to “surrender.” That was part of Obama’s plan.

    They were NOT to fight back. That would potentially undermine the kidnapping effort and cause unnecessary “complications.” That is why, even though the CIA operatives and ex-Navy Seals were on the ground, providing real-time reports, and even though they were “lighting up” the source of the mortars attacking the compound with lasers, no gun ships or support ever came. They weren’t supposed to resist.

    That wasn’t “part of the plan.” It also wasn’t part of the plan for one of the CIA operatives to intentionally defy Obama’s orders, and who rescued the body of Sean Smith and then stood up against orders, and engaged the enemy who was attacking American soil. It was supposed to be “clean.” Quick. Efficient.

    Kidnap the Ambassador and get out. Then Save The Day in the “nick of time.” They didn’t factor in a tiny group of highly trained ex-Navy Seals/CIA operatives… American Patriots and heroes. Even though they eventually lost their lives in the firefight, they managed to employ the full measure of their skills, and took out over 80 attackers in the process… which enraged the attackers, who were led to believe that they would encounter no resistance.

    THAT is why Ambassador Stevens was raped (sodomized), murdered, and dragged through the streets. In their warped minds, they believed that they had been betrayed by the U.S. yet again. They believed that Obama was their friend. They believed that they were going to get their beloved Blind Sheik back. And yet, here were 80 of their own… dead by American hands.

    Obama was asked directly in an interview if he denied their request for assistance, he refused to answer, and instead droned on with a canned response promising to “bring those responsible to justice.”

    Former CIA and State Dept. personnel are coming out now with damning evidence that indicts President Obama, and reveals the truth about what is going on. Hillary Clinton, who is now openly laying the blame at the feet of the President, after falling on her sword in a premature show of loyalty for the Administration.

    The “Video” defense was carefully crafted WEEKS in advance, to explain the attack. If this doesn’t outrage you, If you are not moved enough to contact your congressman about this, you are not worthy of your citizenship.

    Serenity is not Freedom from the Storm, but Peace with in it…….. In GOD We Trust

    M. D. McGranahan

    • Robert DeFillipo says:

      I am appalled… this must be dealt with arrest for treason and sentenced to be carried out immediately.

  9. duthinker says:

    The pieces of proof are coming together for what some of us already knew, that the entire Benghazi attack was carefully planned to achieve a particular set of goals. No one wants to believe that our own government has become this corrupt but the facts speak for themselves. No other administration in the history of the US has had so many requests for backup and reinforcement denied to an embassy outpost. This was unequivocally planned by both our administration and the Islamic jihadist perpetrators .

  10. RemoteViewer says:

    Obama Tells Egypt’s Christians Not To Protest Muslim Brotherhood Morsi Regime (The US & NWO banking cabal Puppet regime, just like the Turkish puppet Regime) He is not just our Tyrant Dictator he’s telling other people in other nations what to do.

Leave a Reply