Obama does as Obama is

Lie of the Year

Obama won Politifact’s “Lie of the Year” Award in 2013.

First and foremost, Barack Obama is a congenital liar, whose lies, the number and magnitude of which are produced to match the scale of his sweeping narcissism.

That type of behavior is no surprise because Obama’s character was incubated in the low expectations biosphere of political correctness, where the amount of ineptitude is excused in proportion to one’s racial genetics, ethnic purity or whatever victim categories the liberal canon dictates.

Obama has had no incentive to change because throughout life and during his time in the White House, lying has gotten him what he has wanted, while escaping responsibility and any negative consequences.

America’s elite universities and the media, desperately wanting to validate their own ideological predispositions, have overlooked Obama’s obvious weaknesses and willingly accepted his excuses and political spin in order to avoid their own accountability for facilitating and advancing the career of an amoral and intellectually vacant individual.

For the Democratic Party, Obama was the textbook Affirmative Action Presidential candidate, the manifestation of a liberal fantasy.  Senate Majority leader Senator Harry Reid (D-NV), wowed by Obama’s oratorical gifts, said privately that Obama, as a black candidate, could be successful thanks, in part, to his “light-skinned” appearance and speaking patterns “with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.”

Obama’s appeal is based entirely on his mastery of the teleprompter-delivered platitude; a banal or meaningless statement either emotionally satisfying to his ideologically committed base or soothing to the uninformed, easily misled voter desperately in search of a political tranquilizer.

Obama, who never intellectually matured beyond the clichés of fashionable and comfortable college Marxism, received his political baptism in the leftist, gangster-style Chicago political machine, experiences neither of which prepared him for any office beyond the capabilities of inner city alderman.

Ill-prepared for high office, Obama has orchestrated an unprecedented series of policy failures and political scandals.

That happens when decisions are not based on a logical analysis of what course of action is best for the country, but on a calculus of what best meets certain political or electoral objectives.

Obama is an ideologue, whose fundamental transformation of the United States includes goals that are incompatible with American values and national interests. His approach is not unlike pounding a square political peg into a round political hole.

The ultimate basis for any judgment about the rightness of his conduct is whether he achieves an important ideological aim. Thus, “right” outcomes for Obama often necessitate actions considered illogical or harmful by mainstream Americans.

Obama is incompetent, not because he is stupid, but because his intellectual rigor mortis drives an ideological “analysis” that inevitably leads to inaction or the wrong action.

Stated simply, Obama is mentally and emotionally incapable of making the right decisions for America.

Obama’s reaction to his policy debacles is invariably the same. He lies or blames others because his narcissism cannot accommodate failure and any perceived loss of public adulation.

Enough is enough. We are a nation, not a political playground for megalomaniacs. Soaring rhetoric is no substitute for competence, honesty and resolute action.

A continued Obama Presidency risks the survival of the United States. He is and does what he is. There is no hope that he will change and no limit to the damage he can cause.

Will Congress decide it is time for Barack Obama to go?

Don't forget to follow the D.C. Clothesline on Facebook and Twitter. PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

29 Responses to Obama does as Obama is

  1. Chris says:

    Lawrence Sellen: “Ill-prepared for high office, Obama has orchestrated an unprecedented series of policy failures and political scandals.

    “That happens when decisions are not based on a logical analysis of what course of action is best for the country, but on a calculus of what best meets certain political or electoral objectives.”

    The Obamanation was not “Ill-prepared.” He was pre-prepared and hasn’t “orchestrated” ANYTHING ! He’s not the one in charge !

    Are you really that naive that you think such things like ObamanationCare, all the “skrew-ups”, etc. and their consequences were “unintended” ????

    As the late Nord Davis Jr. used to say: “Learn to see what you’re looking at.”

    Do you really believe they could have screwed up that website so badly – by mistake ?    Just like they did such a terrible job on the fake birth certificate; so badly botched – by professionals ? 

    What, do you think they hired some flunkies to do these things ?

    The list of crimes, scandals, “screw-ups”, etc., goes on and on you (like most) are being played like a fiddle and think he’s the one making these decisions, while they throw one after another in your collective faces.

    This Manchurian Candidate type, bi sexual puppet, the Obamanation (as well as the “other presidents” over the last century), and the vast majority of Congress, are merely MIDDLE MANAGEMENT and are owned and controlled by those wicked ones that put them there, which is our punishment from The Great I Am for rejecting Him and His Perfect Moral Laws.   

    And now we can’t figure out how to reverse this deplorable condition we’re in and why we’re standing at the edge of the cliff with BOTH feet on banana peels !     

    Oh yeah, we’ll “vote” our way out. No, better yet we’ll ask the question: “Will Congress decide it is time for Barack Obama to go?”   

    Hoping on such fools’ hopes has been working pretty good so far, right ????

    The sooner we all get a grip on this fact and recognize it, the sooner we can all understand the real problems and get to solutions.

    Furthermore, a sizable enough portion of the AmeriKan people “voted” for this half breed “stranger” in violation of The Almighty’s Law ” … thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother”, (i.e., of your lineage).  Deuteronomy 17: 15.

    We’re not even supposed to have such aliens in our Assemblies: “A bastard (Hebrew: Mamzer = mixed blood, half breed, etc.) shall not enter into the congregation of Yahweh; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of Yahweh.”  Deut. 23: 2.   But, it would be OK, as long as the alien is a conservative, right?

    The only way to save this nation is to turn back to Him, His Perfect Moral Laws, Statutes and Judgments, i.e., His Kingdom/Will On Earth.

  2. Laura Bernard Mielcarek says:

    Duh on me, posted that comment on the wrong article. Lol.

  3. vewtcvxcvwet says:

    Unbelievable… My friend Lynn has just married to a handsome black man.They met through ~~ ♥ ВlackŴhiteHub. Com ♥ ~ ~ They told me it is a serious black and white dating for black&white singles looking for interracial relationship and love. I have tried. It is fantastic! Tens of thousands of charming singles are there. Come in and give it a shot, you will find your dream lesbian match there.erttttttttcvbc

    • Just anothrr conspiracy theory site dedicated to lies, twisted half truths and innuendos just like this one. If you want to prove something use a reputable source.

      • Laura Bernard Mielcarek says:

        Did you read the article 5WV linked? If you had even just clicked on the link you would have discovered that the article DOES cite reputable sources, bozo.

        You REFUSE to verify for yourself because you don’t WANT any of it to be true. You don’t want it to be true because then you would have to admit that you were WRONG about this site and the readers.

        So, you refuse to look anything up for yourself, instead, DEMANDING that verification be placed in your sweaty hands. Even when the proof IS provided for you, you STILL can’t admit you were wrong and dismiss the proof by saying none of the sources are reputable.

        Here are just some of the sources that reported these lies: the hill; yahoo news; washington times; fox news; bloomberg; abc news; senate.gov (that’s a government site, bozo); 9news from colorado; la times; reason.com; npr; rolling stone; mother jones.

        Those are just sources for lies 1 through 7.

        You are a hypocrite and a liar, bozo.

          • Laura Bernard Mielcarek says:

            Typical bozo, sigh. When you are proven wrong and have no rebuttal, you fall back on your ignorance regarding voting. Tsk, tsk, tsk. You’ll never establish credibility this way, bozo.

          • Laura Bernard Mielcarek says:

            P.S. You’re welcome for the additional no vote.

          • Laura Bernard Mielcarek says:

            “reply to vote for rbodell to continue posting says:
            June 15, 2014 at 10:52 pm
            Cleavage? OH man this too easy. MOOO”

            “Laura Bernard Mielcarek says:
            June 15, 2014 at 11:00 pm
            They are called breasts, bozo. Not teats or udders. Real men like breasts. Since you aren’t a real man, I’m not surprised by your reaction or comments.”

            As you can see, YOU referenced cows FIRST. I then explained to you that they are called breasts – NOT teats or udders.

            Man, ya know, I almost – ALMOST – feel bad that I am smacking you down like this; rendering you only capable of curling up into the fetal position and crying like a little baby in the corner.

            THEN, I remember what an ass you are and that feeling goes away. All better now.

          • I didn’t want to say you look like a slut.

          • Laura Bernard Mielcarek says:

            “slut
            Houghton Mifflin
            n.noun

            A woman considered sexually promiscuous.
            A woman prostitute.
            A slovenly woman; a slattern.”

            “slattern
            Houghton Mifflin
            n.noun

            An untidy, dirty woman.”

            “slovenly
            Houghton Mifflin
            adj.adjective

            Untidy, as in dress or appearance.
            Marked by negligence; slipshod.”

            One definition of slut is based on a person’s ACTIONS. Whether one is a slut or not CAN’T be determined by appearance. A woman who dresses like Princess Diana COULD be a slut and a woman who dresses like Miley Cyrus could be as pure as the driven snow. Since there is no single slut ‘look,’ saying I LOOK like a slut is completely inaccurate.

            So, you are WRONG (AGAIN) on that.

            Now, in the picture, I am not untidy, dirty, nor do I have a slipshod appearance.

            So, you are wrong on that, also.

            0 for 2, bozo. You’ll never build up your credibility when you keep posting lies. Tsk, tsk.

          • Laura Bernard Mielcarek says:

            Yes, it is correct. Your use of slut in reference to me was 100% incorrect because I don’t fit any of those descriptions.

            You still can’t admit you are wrong, you’re still trying to distract, you’re still a liar.

          • If you dress like one and you talk like one and you and you act like one, guess what.

          • Laura Bernard Mielcarek says:

            Still incapable of admitting you were wrong. Yes, I DID recognize that your comment was an attempt to distract.

        • Chris says:

          Laura “Bernard” Mielcarek,

          Well, we know one thing’s for sure about you: You’re stupid enough to keep replying to this moron troll who goes by the handle of: “reply to cast a vote for rbodell to continue posting”.

          You still haven’t figured out what his handle means ??

          Keep playing right into his hands.

  4. Ask yourself HOW America could end up with such a leader as Obama (and government is full of men and women just like him to one degree or another)? Could it have anything to do with the fact that the constitutional framers, in Article 6, banned Christian tests and with them Biblical qualifications, such as the following?

    “Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them, to be rulers….” (Exodus 18:21)

    For more, see online Chapter 9 “Article 6: The Supreme Law of the Land” of “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective” at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt9.html.

    For a more exhaustive list of of Biblical qualifications for civil leaders, see Chapter 5 “Article 2: Executive Usurpation.”

    • If you actually lived in the USA you would know that you WILL live under our laws whether you like it or not. Gods laws are a choice in ADDITION to mans laws.

      • Wrong! I do live in the USA and approach all laws contrary to God’s in the fashion as found in the following passages:

        “Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.” (Acts 5:29)

        “[T]hese that have turned the world upside down are come hither also … these all do contrary to the decrees of Caesar, saying that there is another king, one Jesus.” (Acts 17:6-7)

      • Rob says:

        Actually yes Fundamentally – if you KNEW about OUR SYSTEM – the reverse is true – but since man loves a lie – and looses track of while belittling foundations he rests in SMOKE. As the heart of the deer panteth so do the souls of men for the water of Creators life, he thirtieth for the living God resting in truth praising Him daily – A day in Yah’s tabernacle are better than 1000 of your’s – Amen.

        • Gregory S. Gill says:

          True Christians will always put and obey God’s law above man’s no matter where they are in this world, including the USA. And if they have to lose their life or whatever else so be it.

  5. Andrew Marcell says:

    Clearly the messenger is far more important than the message.The Obama amateurs and the arrogant Hillary can say anything as there are no consequences. America made many mistakes and this one will pass.

  6. No wonder people don’t believe Obama is a liar, you post so much lies that people just think it is another conspiracy theory

  7. Bird says:

    Facade: a way of behaving or appearing that gives other people a false idea of your true feelings or situation … that’s the POTUS and we all need to look past that!!

  8. Bird says:

    Great article!

Leave a Reply