Tennessee sues federal government over forced refugee ‘resettlement’

The 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

The Obama administration’s dumping of overwhelmingly Muslim “refugees” on states and in so doing, forcing the states to incur financial costs to support the “refugees,” is a contravention of the 10th Amendment. Now, the State of Tennessee is finally doing something about it.

Joel Ebert reports for The Tennessean that yesterday morning, March 13, 2017, Tennessee became the first state in the nation to sue the federal government over refugee resettlement on the grounds of the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Other states have sued the federal government over refugee resettlement but on different legal grounds.

The defendants named in the lawsuit include the U.S. Department of State, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, the Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of Refugee Resettlement.

The 15-page lawsuit:

  • Contends that the federal government has unduly forced states to pay for the refugee resettlement program, and is not complying with the Refugee Act of 1980, which was designed to create a permanent procedure for the admission of refugees into the United States.
  • Maintains that the federal government’s forced resettlement of refugees in Tennessee has led the plaintiffs to “suffer significant and irreparable harm unless this Court intervenes”.
  • Asks the court to force the federal government to stop resettling refugees in Tennessee until all costs associated with the settlement are incurred by the federal government.
READ MORE  Uber driver confirms she picked up Steven Paddock and a woman and dropped them off at Mandalay Bay, and said Paddock commented about a ‘terrorist attack’

The lawsuit also points out that although Tennessee has opted out of the federal refugee resettlement program, the federal government continues to send refugees to Tennessee, and appointed Catholic Charities of Tennessee to administer the program. The refugees forced upon Tennessee requires the state to fund the resettlement with $7 billion from Medicaid, “amounting to 20 percent of its overall state budget — money that is needed to fund services that are critical to the health and welfare of countless Tennesseans.”

The lawsuit was filed by the valiant Thomas More Law Center, a Catholic legal group that has taken on several conservative legal causes in recent years, on behalf of two state lawmakers in the western district of Tennessee: Sen. John Stevens, R-Huntingdon, and Rep. Terri Lynn Weaver, R-Lancaster.

State Sen. John Stevens said in a news release:

“The Constitution does not allow the Federal Government to force me as the elected representative of the 24th Senate District to implement federal programs while they sit in Washington insulated from the consequences.”

The state lawmakers filed the lawsuit after Tennessee’s House of Representatives, in April 2016, by a vote of 69-25 approved a resolution directing Tennessee Attorney General Herbert Slatery to sue the feds. In July, however, Slatery indicated he would not follow the Tennessee legislature’s directive to sue the federal government, but he will not stand in the way of hiring an outside firm to initiate the lawsuit.

The usual groups — American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee and the Tennessee Immigrant and Refugee Rights Coalition — have attacked the lawsuit, saying it will negatively affect the state’s refugee community and perpetuate a culture of fear.

READ MORE  Facebook Partners with Saudi-Funded Think Tank to Censor Posts That Threaten “Democracy”

Holly Johnson, refugee coordinator for Catholic Charities in Tennessee, disputes the lawsuit’s claim that the state incurs special costs to resettle refugees “because they’re refugees.” Claiming that refugees aren’t “eligible for anything that you and I aren’t eligible for,” Johnson disingenuously argues that:

  • Only if a refugee meets the already existing eligibility requirements for TennCare, then the state may pay that benefit.
  • Or if refugee children need to go to school, the state pays the same for the child’s attendance as anyone else at the school.
  • Any benefits related to employment are paid for by the federal government.

Johnson has a snake tongue. Of course, refugees don’t get benefits BECAUSE they’re refugees. But the fact of the matter is that refugees who require welfare and schooling cost Tennessee additional expenses of at least $7 billion in Medicaid — $7 billion that Tennessee would not spend if the federal government had not unilaterally dumped the refugees into the state.

Johnson also managed to omit the fact that Catholic Charities is paid handsomely by the federal government, i.e., taxpayers, to “resettle” refugees. During the 2016 fiscal year, Catholic Charities “resettled” more than 2,000 refugees in Tennessee, the majority of whom came from countries not included on President Trump’s new travel ban.

See also:


Dr. Eowyn’s post first appeared at Fellowship of the Minds

Don't forget to follow D.C. Clothesline on Facebook and Twitter. Click here to help support D.C. Clothesline!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Tennessee sues federal government over forced refugee ‘resettlement’

  1. New Yorker says:

    Let Holly house them in her house. Someone needs to investigate Holly Johnson and her “resettlement-gate” is she making $$.

  2. Steve Underwood says:

    I live in Tennessee and I don’t care what color you are , what your religion may be , who you want to marry , or date ..

  3. Ibn Q Rassooli says:

    Dear ALL readers

    Please spread the following 6 minutes video PROVING that Muslims will NEVER be LOYAL citizens

    This video has more than one million views now

    IQ al Rassooli
    Kafir & Proud!

  4. albany le says:

    Every state needs to join in the effort to stop this criminal activity that Obozo did to our country

  5. VirgoVince says:

    WHAT TOOK SO LONG; WHY didn’t you DEFY the ugly alien sob pos muslime
    terrorist nigger, years ago??
    WHY didn’t ALL REAL American governors DEFY this shit dump?
    NOW, how long will it take to FLUSH this shit OUT OF OUR COUNTRY??

  6. Liberty Valance says:

    The federal Government has had it’s head up its on Political Ass for over 130 Years. Me thinks they are fixated with their own ideas and smell. What the US needs is a statement by the President Trump to reset the Constitution back to the Original 1776 era and start over. That clears out most law books (and hopefully the BAR – recall that the Title of Nobility act of early 1800’s was usurped by JQ Adams who said it never passed; yet countless states adopted it in their State Constitutions up until 1860.

    The TONA was illegally replaced by the Slavery Act (e.g., the 13th false amendment). Ever-sense, the laws of the US have gone to hell.)

    Read and weep for your nation.

  7. Shirley says:

    Why did they not do this when the slug Barry was in the WH. Guess I am confused.

Comments are closed.