Explosive Lawsuit Shows Saudi Arabia Funded a “Dry Run” for 9/11—2 Years Before Attacks

New York, NY — For the first time since that fateful September morning 16 years ago, families of victims of the 9/11 terror attacks are using a new law and are going after Saudi Arabia in lawsuits for their role in the attacks. New evidence in one major lawsuit now reveals the Saudi Arabian embassy in Washington may have funded a “dry run” for the hijackings carried out by two Saudi employees.

This new information is detailed in a bombshell report out of the NY Post. As the Post reports:

Two years before the airliner attacks, the Saudi Embassy paid for two Saudi nationals, living undercover in the US as students, to fly from Phoenix to Washington “in a dry run for the 9/11 attacks,” alleges the amended complaint filed on behalf of the families of some 1,400 victims who died in the terrorist attacks 16 years ago.

The court filing provides new details that paint “a pattern of both financial and operational support” for the 9/11 conspiracy from official Saudi sources, lawyers for the plaintiffs say. In fact, the Saudi government may have been involved in underwriting the attacks from the earliest stages — including testing cockpit security.

“We’ve long asserted that there were longstanding and close relationships between al Qaeda and the religious components of the Saudi government,” said Sean Carter, the lead attorney for the 9/11 plaintiffs. “This is further evidence of that.”

According to the Post:

Citing FBI documents, the complaint alleges that the Saudi students — Mohammed al-Qudhaeein and Hamdan al-Shalawi — were in fact members of “the Kingdom’s network of agents in the US,” and participated in the terrorist conspiracy.

They had trained at al Qaeda camps in Afghanistan at the same time some of the hijackers were there. And while living in Arizona, they had regular contacts with a Saudi hijacker pilot and a senior al Qaeda leader from Saudi now incarcerated at Gitmo. At least one tried to re-enter the US a month before the attacks as a possible muscle hijacker but was denied admission because he appeared on a terrorist watch list.

Qudhaeein and Shalawi both worked for and received money from the Saudi government, with Qudhaeein employed at the Ministry of Islamic Affairs. Shalawi was also “a longtime employee of the Saudi government.” The pair were in “frequent contact” with Saudi officials while in the US, according to the filings.

“After they boarded the plane in Phoenix, they began asking the flight attendants technical questions about the flight that the flight attendants found suspicious,” according to a summary of the FBI case files.

READ MORE  Fact Check: Yes, Joe Biden Is Dumb

“When the plane was in flight, al-Qudhaeein asked where the bathroom was; one of the flight attendants pointed him to the back of the plane,” it added. “Nevertheless, al-Qudhaeein went to the front of the plane and attempted on two occasions to enter the cockpit.”

The attempt to enter the cockpit was so frightening that the plane actually made an emergency landing and both men were apprehended in the airport by the FBI. However, neither of them were charged, and the FBI let them both go.

During the investigation, the FBI confirmed that both of their tickets were indeed paid for by the Saudi Arabian Embassy.

“The dry run reveals more of the fingerprints of the Saudi government,” said Kristen Breitweiser, one of the New York plaintiffs, whose husband perished at the World Trade Center, according to the Post.

“These guys were Saudi government employees for years and were paid by the Saudi government,” she added. “In fact, the Saudi Embassy paid for their plane tickets for the dry run.”

This new information, while certainly bombshell, also backs up previous evidence of Saudi Arabia’s role in the deadly attacks.

Naturally, lawyers for Saudi Arabia are denying all allegations and are demanding that the lawsuit be dismissed immediately.

Waleed Nassar, an international disputes attorney who represents two Saudi charities that are defendants in 9/11 litigation alongside Saudi Arabia, said “the evidence, along with much of what has been submitted, is innuendo and circumstantial”.

“The plaintiff’s burden is to show something more direct and that’s really the only hope they have to have Saudi Arabia remain in the litigation,” Nassar said.

READ MORE  The Bilderberg Plan to Force Us on the Digital Grid

However, thanks to the release of the 28 pages last year, Americans and the rest of the world now know that Saudi Arabia played a significant role in the September 11th attacks. Also, thanks to the release of 28 pages, we know that the US government was complicit in covering up Saudi Arabia’s role in the attacks.

For a decade and a half, Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush kept secret the alleged role Saudi Arabia played in the September 11 attacks on America. Becuase of the cozy relationship the US has with the terrorist nation — which Trump is complicit in maintaining — special interests within the government have chosen to protect their Saudi friends instead of telling Americans the truth about what happened that fateful day.

Only because of the vigilance of those seeking the truth is this lawsuit and others like it now a reality. In fact, another lawsuit, filed earlier this year, produced similar evidence.

According to an exclusive report by PIX 11, the lawsuit contains evidence which:

details how officials from Saudi embassies supported hijackers Salem al-Hazmi and Khalid Al-Mihdhar 18 months before 9/11.

The officials allegedly helped them find apartments, learn English and obtain credit cards and cash. The documents state that the officials helped them learn how to blend into the American landscape.

The suit also produces evidence that officials in the Saudi embassy in Germany supported lead hijacker Mohamed Atta. It claims that a Saudi official was in the same hotel in Virginia with several hijackers the night before the attacks….

The lawsuit asserts that the Saudi royals, who for years had been trying to curry favor with fundamentalists to avoid losing power, were aware that funds from Saudi charities were being funneled to al-Qaida.

Aviation attorney Jim Kreindler told PIX11 News: “The charities were alter egos of the Saudi government.”

READ MORE  Russian Firm Savages Mueller For Trying To Hide Evidence Using 'Fake Law'

“The Saudis were so duplicitous,” Kreindler said. “They claim to be allies fighting with U.S. against Iran, while at the same time working with the terrorists. There’s no question they had a hand in the 9/11 attacks.”

Courtesy of The Free Thought Project

Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project. Follow @MattAgorist on TwitterSteemit, and now on Facebook.

Don't forget to follow D.C. Clothesline on Facebook and Twitter. Click here to help support D.C. Clothesline!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Explosive Lawsuit Shows Saudi Arabia Funded a “Dry Run” for 9/11—2 Years Before Attacks

  1. Adorable_Deplorable_Girl says:

    I have to walk past this DISGUSTING embassy every day. Sadly our tax payer money funds government provided security for these pieces of garbage. They do not belong in the Western world or with modern civilization.

  2. Dennis Habern says:

    This is all BS, contrived by NWO and George Soros. It was an inside job, regardless

    of what has been publicly printed. The Bush’s and the Saudi Government were in

    cahoots together, to make it appear that a group of Saudi Nationals and a few others,

    would attempt to appear to hijacking these 4 aircraft, when in reality, the Twin-Towers

    and Building 7 were reduced to ashes by the same implosion devices, so that G.W.

    Bush could use the excuse to attack Saddam Hussein in Iraq, because he maintained

    weapons of mass destruction. But the real excuse for attacking Hussein, was so that

    the U.S. and its Allies, could confiscate the rich revenues from the oil fields. Perhaps

    it is the sole reason that George Soros has not been arrested, because he owns the

    Democrat Party, and therefore, the DNC is covering for him, because they are just as

    guilty as Soros in the downfall of the Twin Towers and Building 7. Speaking of

    Building 7, it was not attacked by any aircraft, supposedly how the Twin Towers

    met their fate, but, but, but, Building 7 met the same demise as the Twin Towers

    which has been viewe as a man-made implosion. I do not believe that anybody has

    fully explained how Building 7 was reduced to ashes. Then too, there is the

    insurance scam in which one of the Bush famly members were involved. Something

    to do with the idea that the Twin Towers and Building 7, were heavily insured and

    perhaps needed to be torn down, because of the asbestos element used in the

    Twin Towers and Building 7’s construction or some other excuse, which made for

    a reason to collect the insurance from these 3 buildings, and therefore, could blame

    their demise on the Muslims. In addition, why did G.W. Bush permit the Osama Bin

    Laden famly to escape from New York City, when their plane was the only aircraft to

    be permitted to be in the air at this fateful time? Then, there is the excuse that the

    Israeli’s were involved in the implosion of all 3 buildings, but, for what reason?

    Similar to the false investigation concerning the Benghazi, LIbya attack on our

    American Embassy, September 11, 2001, needs to be further investigated, to arrive

    at a more truthful answer. Why was there not any aircraft parts, luggage, and

    bodies discovered at all three locations, if in fact that aircraft were used as guided

    missiles? That has never been explained. When the authorities discovered the

    remains of the aircraft that crashed in Pennslyvania, they found that the nomen-

    clature of what was found on the ground, did not fit the description of the fateful

    aircraft that supposedly crashed in that Pennslyvania field. There are too many

    unanswered questions that need to be answered by our American Government.

  3. James Higginbotham says:


Comments are closed.