An Everett, Pennsylvania, teenager is facing two years locked away over some offensive photos posted to his Facebook account.

The photos depict him in mock sexual positions with a Jesus Statue.  The statue does not appear to have been harmed during the incident.


take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

KRON4 reports that the photos were taken and uploaded in July in front of the “Love in the Name of Christ” Christian organization in his hometown of Everett.

The young man is charged with “Desecration of a Venerated Object.”, which is defined as “Defacing, damaging, polluting or otherwise, physically mistreating in a way that the actor knows will outrage the sensibilities of persons likely to observe or discover the action.”

This is a charge that was often used against people who burnt American flags in protest.

In Texas v. Johnson, Johnson was charged with Desecration of a Venerated Object for burning an American Flag during the 1984 Republican National Convention in Dallas.

The case brought to light questions about whether or not expressive acts were protected under the amendment. The supreme court ultimately decided that the burning of the flag in protest was in fact, protected speech, since it was done in an expressive manner with obvious political intentions.

It is important to note that any act may be protected or not depending upon context and intention. For example, if a flag was burned in protest it is protected speech, if it was burned as an act of vandalism, it is not.

If the young man was expressing his distaste for the church, then legally, per our constitution, these charges must be dropped.

Cassandra Rules’ article comes courtesy of The Free Thought Project.

Editor’s Note: “Even when I do not agree with what you say, I respect your right to say it.” I can not condone what this kid did. I am a Christian and this is quite offensive to me. However, if we are to support the Constitution then we must ask ourselves questions about certain things that happen. Does the Constitution only protect those who agree with us? I realize that this is an article that will stir a lot of negative emotion in a lot of people. It did that to me. But I just can’t support throwing a kid in prison because he doesn’t think like me. America represents roughly 5% of the world population yet has roughly 25% of the world’s prison population. Land of the free? What do you think? -Dean Garrison