Yesterday’s Liberal Muslim Thinker is Today’s Corpse

THE EXPRESS TRIBUNE

Under the sharia, this is what happens to the real moderates, the real reformers in Islam. Perhaps another ad should be created, “Yesterday’s reformer is today’s murder victim under sharia.”

NYT: A liberal Muslim scholar who had been accused of blasphemy for a speech he gave during a visit to the United States was shot and killed in Karachi on Thursday, the city police said. The scholar, Muhammad Shakil Auj, was the dean of Islamic studies at the state-run University of Karachi.

Dr. Auj was shot in the head and neck and died immediately, officials said. A female student in the back of the car was shot in the arm and was treated at a hospital.

I reported on this cold-blooded murder here.  Scroll down for an interview with the professor that was never published.

Back in 2013, sitting in his office, he told me about the death threats. He told me how some students visibly cringed at some of his views in class. He spoke of the fabricated charges of plagiarism heaped on him, of people in the department who made no secret of their hatred for him, of the blasphemy charge filed against him, the abusive text messages and shameful slander. “Most of my students know all this, you can ask them – but don’t write this in your newspaper because it will make matters worse for me.”

Under Islam, any Muslim who tries to reform or reinterpret the Quran is a “hypocrite.” Hypocrisy is punishable by death.

“Transitions: Remembering the man who dared to speak his mind,” By Faiza Rahman, Express Tribune, September 20, 2014

 

People carrying the body of Dr Muhammad Shakil Auj for funeral prayers. PHOTO: MOHAMMAD NOMAN/EXPRESS

KARACHI: I reached the University of Karachi’s Islamic Studies department on a Friday morning to meet Dr Shakil Auj, the dean of the Islamic studies faculty. I had a few questions to ask him for a report.

I had known him from before, but had never visited his office. The absence of protocol startled me. Usually outside deans’ offices, there is a secretary or two, who might glare at you in annoyance, ask you gruffly if you had an appointment, and call the busy professor inside on the extension phone to check your veracity.

Nothing here. I wandered in unsurely through the door which stood ajar. Dr Auj was unassumingly cordial. Most of the male professors in this department wore shalwar kameez, a topi and sported a long beard. Dr Shakil wore a suit with a tie.

“Aaj kal ke bachon ki tarha mein bhi shayad liberal hi hoon [Perhaps I am also liberal like the kids these days],” he said, breaking the ice. Some other students sitting in the office chuckled.

We talked about how the Islamic Studies syllabus had – or hadn’t – evolved over the years. We talked about how only some versions of religion are systematically pruned out, a practice that made for the well-spring of extremism. The questions I asked probably sounded very naïve to him. But not once did I feel patronised.

Indeed, I am in no position to pronounce a verdict on Dr Auj’s scholastic calibre for I have neither the requisite academic training to do so nor the sufficient exposure to his classroom skills. But I’ll say this: he surely knew how to put up a fight.

He had borne the most intimidating consequences for trying to make the syllabus more progressive.The messages, the threats, the rumours, the murmurs – those were fruits of his struggle. Or were they a direct result of his equal regard and respect for other interpretations of faith? I forgot to ask him that.

One usually can’t stop arguing with people who have grown old among books, people like Dr Auj, who was conferred a DLitt degree – the highest of academic honours, a notch above even the PhD. Such people, who might have spent tedious years looking up an obscure source in books, come with a certain common characteristic: they are patient and humble enough to listen to a person much, much younger than them offer half-baked opinions on matters they themselves have spent a lifetime studying. They correct you with a gentleness that betrays a deep respect for young, questioning minds. These are the people who, quite subconsciously, train us both intellectually and socially.

Back in 2013, sitting in his office, he told me about the death threats. He told me how some students visibly cringed at some of his views in class. He spoke of the fabricated charges of plagiarism heaped on him, of people in the department who made no secret of their hatred for him, of the blasphemy charge filed against him, the abusive text messages and shameful slander. “Most of my students know all this, you can ask them – but don’t write this in your newspaper because it will make matters worse for me.”

I didn’t then, but I wish I had. Perhaps it would have improved matters. Everyone, from students in the department to the university’s vice chancellor and the police, was well-aware of the icy-cold atmosphere within the department. Why wasn’t there an inquiry? Why wasn’t anyone deposed? I am a mere outsider to the grief of Dr Auj’s loss. If these matters are so sickening to me, one can only wonder at the trauma that his students and family might be undergoing.

May his soul rest in peace.

Courtesy of Pamela Geller.

COMMUNITY LINKS: Visit Our Sister Site for Articles Not Seen Here | Browse our Store for Conservative Gifts & Apparel | Trending Politics