In an April 7th AP sourced article at theblaze.com, as Barack Obama struggles to promote his helter-skelter nuke deal with Iran to dubious critics, in what some perceive to be a Freudian slip during an NPR interview, Obama appeared to divulge a pertinent detail to his nuclear negotiations that highlights a ubiquitous threat that has taken center stage in the fallout of Obama’s slip of the lip.
~WASHINGTON (AP) — Defending an emerging nuclear deal, President Barack Obama said Iran would be kept a year away from obtaining a nuclear weapon for more than a decade, but conceded Tuesday that the buffer period could shrink to almost nothing after 13 or more years.
Obama, whose top priority at the moment is to sell the framework deal to critics, was pushing back on the charge that the deal fails to eliminate the risk because it allows Iran to keep enriching uranium. He told NPR News that Iran will be capped for a decade at 300 kilograms – not enough to convert to a stockpile of weapons-grade material.
“What is a more relevant fear would be that in Year 13, 14, 15, they have advanced centrifuges that enrich uranium fairly rapidly, and at that point, the breakout times would have shrunk almost down to zero,” Obama said.~
~Breakout time refers to how long it would take to build a bomb if Iran decided to pursue one full-bore – in other words, how long the rest of the world would have to stop it. The framework deal expands Iran’s breakout time – currently two to three months – to at least a year. But that constraint would stay in place only for 10 years, at which point some restrictions would start phasing out.~
Afterwards the White House went into immediate damage control, sending out State Department spokesperson Marie Harf to try and portray Obama’s slip of the tongue as being a misinterpreted faux pas. Conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh elaborated on this desperate clean up operation during the April 8th edition of his nationally syndicated radio program:
Marie Harf Corrects Obama:
~RUSH: I think everybody’s got this Marie Harf thing wrong. Have you heard about this? Obama goes out there, and I forget where, it was an interview, NPR, somewhere — and he let the cat out of the bag, that everything Netanyahu has said about the Iran deal is true, that the Iranians are gonna get a nuke courtesy of Barack Obama and the United States. Obama went out there and admitted it himself. And that’s the story about in 10 to 13 years they’re gonna be able to nuke up. Essentially they have promised to stay one year away from weaponizing their uranium for ten years. So they’re one year away now, five years from now they’re supposed to stay one year away.
In other words, they’re not supposed to advance their capabilities beyond where they are now, not much. And then 10, 13 years from now they can go ahead and close the deal and get a weapon. Obama essentially went out and said that. So they went to the State Department, and Marie Harf, who we have referenced on this program — you know, it’s really tough for me. Marie Harf, you’ve heard the old line, if you want to see X in the dictionary, whatever, go look at such-and-such. Marie Harf is that.
She is the textbook dictionary definition of “valley girl,” Northeastern Ivy League liberal, trained the government’s the end all to everything, feminist. Everything in the ideal liberal female package, including appearance, she’s it. She’s second in command at it State Department as spokeswoman. Jen Psaki was her boss — Psaki is leaving and I think heading to the White House, but she may still be at the State Department.
Anyway, Marie Harf went out and said that Obama was a little mixed up there in describing what he had said about the nuclear deal. Here’s the headline of the story, and they’re all over the place. “‘Open Confusion’ at State Department as Marie Harf Tries to Walk Back Obama’s Zero Breakout Time Admission — ‘Open confusion’ reigned today at the State Department after spokeswoman Marie Harf tried to withdraw a quote from President Barack Obama regarding Iran’s nuclear breakout time.”
“Harf asserted that while the president’s words ‘were a little mixed up there,’ he was in fact ‘referring to a scenario in which there was no deal,’ adding that the president’s scenario was ‘more of a hypothetical, “well look, without a deal, this is what could possibly happen.” He was not indicating what would happen under an agreement in those years.'” He was not indicating that this is what the deal is now.
A lot of people, among them the website here, the Israel Project, “outright rejected Harf’s explanation noting that the president wasn’t muddled, as Harf asserted, but was responding to a question about whether the deal with Iran was worthwhile given the concessions on Iran’s stockpile, ‘he dismissed the stockpile concern, then said the “more relevant fear” had to do with the sunset provisions that would allow Iran to have a zero breakout time after year 13. There’s no room for reinterpretation there.'”
Rush also provided the following insight as an explanation to the guiding impulse directing Obama’s motives in his nuke deal with Iran. SPOILER ALERT: Odds are you’ve already been thinking the same thing yourself:
~”Obama’s worldview on this deal is that we don’t have the right to tell Iran that they don’t get a nuclear weapon. In fact, everybody realize: He wants them to have a nuclear weapon!”~
One can only speculate at what happened to Obama’s formerly held position at the concept of a nuclear-armed Iran. A position he had related to the people of Israel while on a visit to the Holy land during a March 21st, 2013 address at the Jerusalem International Convention Center:
~”When I consider Israel’s security, I also think about a people who have a living memory of the Holocaust, faced with the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iranian government that has called for Israel’s destruction. It’s no wonder Israelis view this as an existential threat. But this is not simply a challenge for Israel — it is a danger for the entire world, including the United States. (Applause.) A nuclear-armed Iran would raise the risk of nuclear terrorism. It would undermine the non-proliferation regime. It would spark an arms race in a volatile region. And it would embolden a government that has shown no respect for the rights of its own people or the responsibilities of nations.”~
Apparently Obama’s former position against a nuclear-armed Iran has evolved (much like his former position of marriage being exclusively between a man and a woman has evolved) to where now not only does he recognize the inevitability of Iran acquiring nuclear weapons, he accepts this outcome. Which makes me wonder in what reality is Obama knowingly paving the path for a sworn enemy of the United States to possess nuclear weapons not treason?
That’s the bottom line here. Never mind all of the disparate headlines and the armchair pontificating by media anchors and pundits dissecting every detail of Obama’s questionable nuke deal down to their minutia. When you tear up the carpet and get down to the brass tacks, that’s what this entire controversy boils down to. Iran getting a nuclear weapon. That’s the 900 pound Gorilla in the room throwing its crap at everyone, because that is the trophy Iran covets at the finish line of this race. For anyone to believe otherwise is either gross ignorance or profound stupidity.
But it is ironic how it wasn’t until Barack Hussein Obama and his most valued senior White House Vizier Valerie Jarrett came along that this gradual conditioning to the concept of a nuclear Iran became incrementally insinuated into our nation’s collective consciousness. To the extent that now it appears we have become resigned in acquiescing to what was previously believed to be an intolerable denouement. Not to mention the conspicuous fact that this is a regime known to be involved in supporting terrorist activity which has led to the deaths of hundreds of American troops. That alone makes the idea of any negotiations with Iran that doesn’t require seeing this nihilistic regime reduced to a smoking crater in the ground inconceivable.
But such are the inverse times in which we live today, compounded exponentially with Barack Hussein Obama’s distorting coercion. Right has become wrong and wrong is…Well, you know. We have these diversionary stories of fascistic gay militants going berserk around the country attacking Christian florists, bakers and pizza makers while Obama’s Islamic band of extremist brothers continue laying their bloody scourge across the Middle East. Then there’s the ongoing coverage of Hillary Clinton’s political schemes and campaign strategies as she still somehow remains the presumed 2016 Democratic nominee for president instead of facing the indictment and prosecution her past misconduct would warrant in a more lucid America.
I’d be remiss too if I failed to mention the hot off the press scuttlebutt centering around RINO Arizona Senator John McCain’s political cupidity feeding his antediluvian ambitions at seeking a 6th term in the U.S. Senate. How he plans to accomplish this feat after having been previously censured by his home State’s GOP for being too agreeable with his Democratic rivals is anyones guess. Then we have the other ruling caste of elitist monarchs who habitually flaunt the rule of law in ways that would likely see any of us lowly peasants coasting up Crap Creek without a paddle for the remainder of our natural born lives were we to transgress in similar fashion. But such is the privilege of these ivory towered silver spooners, under whose congenital abuses of power over many decades has seen our intended “government of the people” becoming methodically usurped.
But I digress. Despite the aforementioned usurpation of government, there was still a veneer of pretense, however gossamer it may have been at times, maintained for the sake of appearances to soothe the low-info masses. Then in 2008, along comes the apocryphal conundrum that was Barack Hussein Obama, with his fictitious promises of “hope and change“, his radical associations of domestic terrorists and absolutely no qualifications to justify his run for the presidency. Emerging from his esoteric realm of political nebulousness, defying what should have been insurmountable odds to become elected to the highest Office of our land as America’s 1st black (mulatto) president.
That was an alarming aberration which served to show millions of American’s just how precipitous this erosion of our country has actually been and just how far we’ve declined as the greatest free nation in the history of the world. Subsequently, any prior eidolons of the charade many had known previously were dispersed as institutions of government and the rule of law became assiduously mangled and maimed by this flimflammer. Astonishing spectacles of overt criminal negligence unlike anything we had ever seen before, leaving a majority of the nation slack jawed. Criminal negligence that has perpetually been met with no opposition from GOP leadership. No resistance at all. Just the meaningless, hollow rhetoric of vacillating hollow men who rattle their dull sabers and do nothing. Whose contemptible abdication to their sworn oaths and duty to their nation in the face of such criminality is remarkable.
It takes a particularly virulent strain of moral leprosy to deaden a politicians nerves to such egregious violations and their potential repercussions, but none of these eunuchs apparently want to be christened as racists on the altar of political correctness for having the effrontery to challenge America’s 1st black president. At least that’s one suspected reason commonly attributed for this clandestine breakdown by GOP members of the legislative branch (whatever significance Obama’s being America’s 1st black president really means anymore). Obama is bringing in thousands of unvetted Muslims from Syria. He does this having suspended laws meant to prohibit those who had engaged in any terrorist activity so that now those who had engaged in only limited terrorist activity are allowed into our country.
Obama wants tens of thousands more Muslim ‘refugees’:
~Amid concerns potential terrorists can take advantage of the U.S. refugee quota for Syrians, it may be instructive to recall the family of Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the brothers who carried out the Boston Marathon bombing, were granted political asylum in the U.S. under a similar program.
WND reported last week a senior FBI official has admitted the U.S. is finding it virtually impossible to screen out terrorists that could be hiding among the tens of thousands of Syrian “refugees” heading soon to American cities through the State Department’s refugee-resettlement program.~
It’s public knowledge that Obama supports the Muslim Brotherhood. A known and designated Islamic terrorist organization with Obama’s support extending as far as him appointing cabinet positions to members of the Muslim Brotherhood in his own administration. Shortly after his illegal running operation out of Benghazi, Libya blew up in his face following the Islamic terrorist attack which left our U.S. Ambassador and 3 other American’s slain, Obama then waived a law specifically meant to prohibit providing weapons to known terror groups in order for him to continue providing weapons to a known terror group (i.e. those al-Qaeda linked Syrian rebels). This entire presidency has become an intricately complex weaving of threads laden with scandals, deceit, and a diversity of articulated treachery. All accomplished over a protracted period of time to where I think people have become so desensitized, Obama could feed puppies and kittens into a woodchipper during a nationally televised press conference from the White House rose garden and I doubt anyone would blink at this point.
And while Obama has made his bias favoring Islam no secret, one must question his motivation in overseeing such unprecedented legislative persecution of our nation’s collective Christian faiths and the extraordinary lengths he has undertaken to do it. Where they’re now designated by the Pentagon as religious extremists. It seems obvious to me, but you need to remember we have this opposition Party posing absolutely no opposition and who allow the polarizing fiats of political correctness to dictate the terms.
What’s disturbing is that former veneer I mentioned earlier which presented the mirage of government still being one of the people when in actuality it was not. That stripped veneer has been replaced by another, more duplicitous occultation. One where the reality of this fast tracked deterioration of our country by this pseudo president is being glossed over by virtually everyone in the media. It’s to be expected from these Stalinist propagandists in the Democratic branch of the press corp, but even Fox News, despite their orthodox criticisms of this administration, still seem to be turning a blind eye to the true threat of this conspicuous peril. Again, in a lucid America, the watchdogs of this decrepit media establishment would be howling a warning at the top of their lungs to the public. Instead, if they’re not ingratiating themselves to the threat itself, they’re chasing their own tails.
It’s like watching a horror movie where we the viewing audience know who the real monster is and where it lurks, but these newscasters who adhere to the edicts of political correctness are like the stereotypical victim of the film who trepidatiously navigates down a flight of stairs into a forbiddingly dark basement. Guided only by their own stupidity and the exiguous light of a single candle to guide their steps into the obsidian abyss of pitch blackness and the impending, gruesome death that awaits them there.
Now we have Obama intentionally paving the path for nuclear weapons to make their way into the hands of an unambiguous enemy to the United States, who abet and conspire in the killings of American soldiers, who chant for our countrys death and who have expressed a recurrent theme in their desire to wipe our ally Israel off the map.
That sure as Hell sounds like treason to me.