Could it be that something happening in education will impact gun ownership? Is President Obama ensuring his legacy to transform America by disqualifying individuals for gun ownership? Does your local school district log information on the social, emotional, and behavioral data of your child and feed anecdotal psychological observation information into federal databanks? Is adjustment of attitudes, values, beliefs, and dispositions to the State’s image the main aspect of the Reauthorization of ESEA, Elementary and Secondary Education Act? Will federal databases eventually disqualify citizens from owning a gun? Yes, emphatically yes! Read on.

The following four reports, two released this past week, and the ESEA Reauthorization legislation moving forward for passage this fall, reveal that, by trampling on our Constitution, President Obama is transforming America into a collectivist state. Analyzing the intersection of these key initiatives will bring into focus the total scheme changing America into something that most Americans won’t recognize. You need to fight against this totalitarian goal.

take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Please read the following analysis and pray that it is not too late.

FIRST Blow to Gun Rights

Concurrent with the restructuring of society through education President Obama has engineered a plan to re-organize neighborhoods. Leo Hohmann, WorldNetDaily, July, 2014, first exposed this plan in his article detailing how President Obama is re-structuring housing. The Hohmann article, New Obama Rule Could Force Cities to House Illegals, Regulation fits perfectly in line with a promise to transform America,” offers a glimpse of how Obama is restructuring ZIP codes. Hohmann rightly calls Obama’s move the” Common Core for local zoning.”


Paul Sperry, in an article, July 18, 2015, from the New York Post, “Obama Collecting Personal Data for a Secret Race Database,” reports how HUD (Housing and Urban Development) plans to integrate illegal immigrants, minorities, and felons into EVERY neighborhood through ZIP CODE analysis. President Obama’s plan for equity in housing is to relocate minorities and illegal aliens into your neighborhood if your town or city is 50% or more white. This is a giant leap away from privacy and the ability to live your life free of government control and free from fear of reprisal. According to Sperry there are five areas that will be analyzed for patterns of “racial disparities and segregation” — Housing databases, Mortgage databases, Credit databases, Employment databases, and School databases.

Quoting from the Sperry article:


A key part of President Obama’s legacy will be the fed’s unprecedented collection of sensitive data on Americans by race. The government is prying into our most personal information at the most local levels, all for the purpose of “racial and economic justice.”

Unbeknown to most Americans, Obama’s racial bean counters are furiously mining data on their health, home loans, credit cards, places of work, neighborhoods, even how their kids are disciplined in school — all to document “inequalities” between minorities and whites.

This Orwellian-style stockpile of statistics includes a vast permanent network of discrimination databases, which Obama already is using to make “disparate impact” cases against: banks that don’t make enough prime loans to minorities; schools that suspend too many blacks; cities that don’t offer enough Section 8 and other low-income housing for minorities; and employers who turn down African-Americans for jobs due to criminal backgrounds.

Federally funded cities deemed overly segregated will be pressured to change their zoning laws to allow construction of more subsidized housing in affluent areas in the suburbs, and relocate inner-city minorities to those predominantly white areas. HUD’s maps, which use dots to show the racial distribution or density in residential areas, will be used to select affordable housing sites. [Emphasis mine]

HUD plans to drill down to an even more granular level, detailing the proximity of black residents to transportation sites, good schools, parks and even supermarkets. If the agency’s social engineers rule the distance between blacks and these suburban “amenities” is too far, municipalities must find ways to close the gap or forfeit federal grant money and face possible lawsuits for housing discrimination.

Civil-rights groups will have access to the agency’s sophisticated mapping software, and will participate in city plans to re-engineer neighborhoods under new community outreach requirements. [Emphasis mine]

…Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing database, which the Department of Housing and Urban Development rolled out earlier this month to racially balance the nation, ZIP code by ZIP code….will map every US neighborhood by four racial groups — white, Asian, black or African-American, and Hispanic/Latino — and publish “geospatial data” pinpointing racial imbalances.

The agency proposes using nonwhite populations of 50% or higher as the threshold for classifying segregated areas.

Cities and towns that accept federal funding will be pressured to change zoning laws to allow construction in affluent neighborhoods, and relocate inner-city minorities to those predominantly white areas. HUD’s maps, which use dots to show the racial distribution or density in residential areas, will be used to select affordable housing sites. (Emphasis mine)

The National Mortgage Database Project compiles 16 years of lending data broken down by race, individual credit scores, employment records, all credit lines, credit cards, student loans, car loans, and anything reported to credit bureaus. The FHFA*collects data on personal assets, debts, bankruptcies, even square footage and lot size of your home and your interest rate.

Through its mandatory Civil Rights Data Collection project, the Education Department is gathering information on student suspensions and expulsions, by race, from every public school district in the country. Districts that show disparities in discipline will be targeted for reform.

…even if there is no other evidence of racism, the numbers themselves will “prove” that things are unfair. Such databases have never before existed. Obama is presiding over the largest consolidation of personal data in US history. He is creating a diversity police state where government race cops and civil-rights lawyers will micromanage demographic outcomes in virtually every aspect of society.

*Federal Housing Finance Agency

Explaining how this will impact your town or city, Stanley Kurtz’s articles in National Review, July 8, 2015, called, “Massive Government Overreach- Obama’s AFFH Rules Are Out,” and July 20, 2015, called, “Attention American Suburbs, You Have Just Been Annexed,” explains how America’s suburbs will be federally re-engineered in nearly every American neighborhood “nullifying municipal boundaries.” Is it the government’s job to diversify neighborhoods by income level and “undo America’s system of local government and replace it with a ‘regional’ alternative that turns suburbs into helpless satellites of large cities?”

(Source: here and here)

The consolidation of these named databases intersects all aspects of our lives in every ZIP code, in every city, town, and hamlet in the United States.

SECOND Blow to Gun Rights

The next step is to re-define who is mentally disabled and who can own a gun. President Obama now pushes to include SSI beneficiaries, deemed being no longer able to “manage their own affairs” in the broad definition of what is a “mentally deficient” person. President Obama collects data on ex-military or anyone receiving benefits from the government who would meet these same definitions from the Social Security Administration. This data would be logged into the National Instant Criminal Background Checks System, decidedly removing the right to purchase a firearm. The following key question must be answered: What is the definition of mentally deficient or mental illness?

In Alan Zarembo’s article in the Chicago Tribune, July 18, 2015,”Obama pushes to extend gun background checks to Social Securityhe quotes the following information: (Source)

Seeking tighter controls over firearm purchases, the Obama administration is pushing for a ban on Social Security beneficiaries from owning guns if they lack the mental capacity to manage their own affairs, a move that could affect millions whose monthly disability payments are handled by others.

The push is intended to bring the Social Security Administration in line with laws regulating who gets reported to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, or NICS, which is used to prevent gun sales to felons, drug addicts, immigrants in the country illegally and others. A potentially large group within Social Security are people who, in the language of federal gun laws, are unable to manage their own affairs due to “marked subnormal intelligence, or mental illness, incompetency, condition, or disease.” [Emphasis mine]


Social Security would generally report names under the same “mental defective” category. The agency is still figuring out how that definition should be applied, LaVelle said. [Emphasis mine]

The NRA issued a statement from its chief lobbyist, Chris W. Cox, saying: “If the Obama administration attempts to deny millions of law-abiding citizens their constitutional rights by executive fiat, the NRA stands ready to pursue all available avenues to stop them in their tracks. [Emphasis mine]


THIRD Blow to Gun Rights

You Might Like

These four reporters – Mr. Hohmann, Mr. Sperry, Mr. Zarembo’s, and Mr. Kurtz – need to extend their research of President Obama’s agenda into the education area. Why? President Obama is already pushing equity in education, and has already redefined who is poor under Title I and who is disabled under IDEA (Special Ed) – to gain control of ALL children and to label them as “mentally deficient” under the Common Core mental adjustment banner!

The results are staggering. The targeting of mostly white neighborhoods and the controlled relocating of minorities and illegals into every ZIP code will effectually artificially inflate the poverty statistics in education. Title I guarantees schoolwide one-on-one interventions with EVERY CHILD if the poverty threshold is met. This will be guaranteed with ZIP code population redistribution. This means that in every school district accountable to federal guidelines, EVERY child will now be labeled a child “At-Risk” of failing to meet government standards – even if his/her parents are millionaires and the child has 120 or higher IQ.

In the Reauthorization of ESEA, Elementary and Secondary Education Act, the federal government must have a scheme to identify (1) the child, (2) the public/charter/private/religious school, and (3) the interventions to snare the entire population into its net:

  1. ALL children will have to be identified as “At-Risk.” Title I is being used to envelop EVERY child as “educationally deprived” and therefore “At-Risk” because of not meeting Common Core psychological standards, which include a child’s attitudes, values, beliefs, and dispositions.
  2. The criteria for poverty must be corrupted to mean EVERY CHILD IN THE ENTIRE SCHOOL. Schoolwide would be implemented under Title I, thereby throwing a blanket over the entire school identifying ALL CHILDREN as “At-Risk.” Title I Portability (“Choice”) grabs the private/parochial schools under the same net called “direct student services” that must be provided to ALL Title I “At-Risk” students who have that voucher in their hand.
  3. All of these “At-Risk” labeled children must receive interventions and services. The interventions and services are extreme combinations of identifying, screening, and remediating EVERY STUDENT to the government-prescribed minimum attitudes, values, beliefs, and dispositions. Schools would use Special Education funding (IDEA) to identify and remediate these mental health “defects.” Every child is identified as needing remediation in an “Individual service plan” thereby justifying the use of psychological interventions on normal children, not just physically disabled or physically related impaired children. (see below)

Realize that a child is now “At-Risk” if they are not meeting Common Core psychological standards, and that 45 states that have adopted Common Core have already agreed to this psychologically manipulative agenda. The remaining states are furthering this scheme under different names and labels. Literally, local control over education has been usurped in every state.

The schools are collecting more data than just discipline and race equalization, as Sperry has pointed out. Every movement that your child makes can be tallied and logged into spy software. The screening and interventions through Special Ed will be based on attitudes, values, opinions, beliefs, dispositions, behavior, using social and emotional traits to identify children who do not match the government’s socialist goals. This screening system identifies “weaknesses” in our American children’s psyches, especially if they do NOT go along with the group. True leadership qualities ARE NOT the goals of the government, and our American children who would be leaders of tomorrow will be identified and selected for remediation and interventions to embrace collectivist goals.

Scientifically-researched techniques and testing called evidence-based curriculum are being used for teacher training in order to comply with this agenda. Techniques are included under such things as Specialized Student Support, Response to Intervention, Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports, Early Intervening Services, Multi-Tiered System of Supports, and Instructional Support Teams. Monitoring behavior and using DSM-V psychological codes to evaluate conduct will target EVERY child for psychological treatment, thereby forcing them into subservience. There is NO code for normal!

Teachers are copiously entering students’ personally identifiable information (PII) into local databases that are digitized and instantly transferred electronically to state longitudinal databases, and on to the national databases (NCES/IES). If your school is telling you there are no national databases, they are lying to you. If your school says they are testing “grit”, citizenship, or ethical behavior, they are identifying and scoring your child’s “threshold”, meaning that point at which your child decides to do the wrong thing. This is conformable to government goals and is manipulated by rewards and punishment. For example, at what point will your child change his/her behavior? If punishment is incurred, will your child obey? The INFORMATION COLLECTED is the vehicle to see how much intervention your child needs to mold them into drones to meet government compliance. Therefore, an individual plan is promoted to make sure your child fits into the government’s mold. Personalized plans for screening, monitoring, and interventions are put in place with a constant feedback loop of remedial interventions… until the child complies.

Whatever happened to academics? Not to be found in these education bills! What about electronic federal government portfolios? Yes! Data is gathered by the bucketful on your family in every state monitoring personalities and remediating individuality. (Source)

Because of President Obama’s Executive Order 12866, the state longitudinal data systems were developed in each state. These aligned each student and teacher with a unique national ID. On top of the collection of psychological, mental (erroneously called) “health” data that is also being collected on students and families – because of Common Core, Title I, and Special Education – the government has also been amassing and accessing entire psychological profiles called psychometric dossiers. These profiles reflect what parents have instilled in their children in the areas of attitudes, values, beliefs, and dispositions. Education databanks are swollen with social, emotional, behavioral, and dispositional personal data on American families – unbeknownst to parents, citizens, and legislators! (See Hoge Testimony, 15 min, PA House Education Committee, Feb. 2105)

FOURTH Blow to Gun Rights.

This next step is the future of America’s Second Amendment, the future of our children, and the future of our neighborhoods. The legislation to Reauthorize ESEA is the biggest restructuring of society agenda to be legislated in history. Right now the legislation has passed both houses of Congress and is in Reconciliation for a bipartisan agreement.

The call for bipartisanship has been voraciously reported all over the media and D.C. Many have said that President Obama vowed to veto Title I Portability (so-called “Choice”) but wants Universal Pre-K. The Republicans have vowed to pass Title I Portability (“Choice”) and are against Universal Pre-K. What does this compromise look like to you? To me this compromise will ensure that ESEA passes thereby legalizing psychological data-tracking and data-trafficking of your child from conception (before birth) on.

To make sure the psychoanalyzing of the baby starts at birth, Universal Pre-K must be included in ESEA. Common Core for babies must also be passed collecting data at birth, even starting at conception. (Source)

ALL children (starting with babies) will have a psychological diagnosis code behind their names. Remember, there is no code for normal!

The implementation of Title I Portability extended for private and parochial schools, pushed by Republican members of Congress, will force this agenda on those private and parochial schools to comply with Common Core Psychological “services.” This places President Obama’s thumbprint on every American child. It also forces every school in America to be chartered.

To further this socialist agenda that ensnares every child equally, President Obama commissioned this exact plan quoted below, for equity called,

For Each and Every Child.


(Source: p. 16) (Spacing mine)


  • First, we begin with a restructuring of the finance systems that underlie every decision about schools, focusing on equitable resources and their cost-effective use.
  • Second, we examine the most critical resource of all: quality teachers and school leaders,the supports they need to be effective with all learners and ways to make sure all studentshave access to high-quality instructional opportunities.
  • Third, we explain the importance of starting early—making the case for high-quality earlylearning for all children, especially for low-income children, who need it most.
  • Fourth, there is the matter of providing critical support— including increased parentalengagement, access to health and social services, extended instructional time and assistancefor at-risk groups—that students in high-poverty communities need to start strong and stay on


  • And fifth, we lay out the changes in accountability and governance necessary to ensure that,a decade from now, there doesn’t need to be yet another commission appointed to call publicattention to the corrosive effects on the nation’s children and our future of the failure to

    advance equity and excellence in America’s public schools.

Lurking in the ESEA legislation to provide all this psychotherapy is President Obama’s STEP 4, using MEDICAID in the schools to accomplish this agenda. This plan was an older plan being pushed in 1995 under the 3rd Option in HillaryCare when Hillary Clinton and her national healthcare scheme was being pushed at that time. MEDICAID billing at school for ALL children was the agenda. It was based on the premise that if ALL American children could have access to healthcare, and be diagnosed by the school as having mental health problems, UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE WOULD BE BROUGHT IN THROUGH THE BACKDOOR, AGE 0-21. So the HillaryCare plan raises its ugly head once again to gather all children into the federal government’s net through the current Obamacare mandate.

Schools apply for partial hospitalization provider licenses to bill for MEDICAID. That means every time a TEACHER, SPECIAL EDUCATION TEAM, INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT TEAM, SOCIAL WORKER. PSYCHOLOGIST, OR PSYCHIATRIST interfaces with a child, they will have the ability to bill MEDICAID. To bill MEDICAID one must place a DSM V psych code on the student’s permanent record for the school to be reimbursed for those psychological services. This psych-coding identifies EVERY child as having a mental health disorder or as “mentally defective.” This psych dossier follows your child for life like a shadow.

Absolutely no child, beginning with conception, will escape these psychological codes.


Step by step the government has made sure that no of-age person will ever qualify to own a gun due to a history of psych diagnoses as described above. In just a few years, with this piece of legislation, the President’s Executive Order 12866, and his equity in housing plan, President Obama will have effectually deleted the Second Amendment to the Constitution.

Unless we stand athwart this totalitarian tank moving out of D.C., and before it rolls right into our ZIP codes, we’ll be left without even a single gun to defend our families, homes, and country.





NRA and GOA, America needs you to join the parents and teachers to fight for academics in the classroom and for all of us to live our lives free of totalitarian government-mandated attitudes, values, and behavior profiling and data banking.

We cannot allow America to become a collectivist regime.






Anita B. Hoge is a lecturer, educational researcher, and parent. She is the subject & main researcher for the book, Educating for the New World Order. “My story is told about an incredible journey into the devious & deceptive operations of our government to change the values, attitudes & beliefs of American children to accept a new world order.” The first to document the expansive data collection operation of our government establishing micro-records on individual people in the United States. Experimentation, illegal testing, & data collection is exposed. She lectured all over the Unites States in the 90’s about illegal & controversial testing, curriculum, & collection of data by our government. Mrs. Hoge has also arranged & lectured town hall meetings all across the state of Pennsylvania to withdraw affective student learning outcomes to stop Outcome Based Education. Because of her efforts Pennsylvania parents won a major victory against OBE in 1992 and she continues the fight to this day.

Courtesy of Freedom Outpost.