SAN BERNARDINO, Calf. (INTELLIHUB) — A few interesting details have surfaced regarding Wednesday’s mass shooting dubbed ‘terror attack’ which killed 14 and injured 17 others. One of the most interesting comes from an eyewitness.
We now know that ATF investigators recovered police issued firearms from the alleged shooters. This key detail was leaked by 2016 GOP Presidential Candidate Carly Fiorina during a press interview after she had overheard a newsroom report that doesn’t fit the official narrative.
Additionally details from an eyewitness, who came forth on the day of the shooting, may have been overlooked by investigators and suggest that there were actually ‘three white shooters’ instead of the radicalized husband and wife natural-born killer team portrayed in some mainline reports.
The witness, Sally Abdelmageed, worked at Inland Medical Center where the attack took place and saw it all unfold firsthand. It’s also important to note that Abdelmageed is likely not lying and that this quite possibly might be the most accurate eyewitness account publicized to date. After all how can two shooters, a man and a petite woman, be mistaken for three white military men with athletic builds?
In a phone interview with CBS Abdelmageed explained:
“I heard shots fired and it was from you know an automatic weapon. […] very unusual. Why would we hear shots? As we looked out the window a second set of shots goes off […] and we saw a man fall to the floor. Then we just looked and we saw three men dressed in all black, military attire, with vests on they were holding assault rifles. As soon as they opened up the doors to building three […] one of them […] started to shoot into the room.”
When asked what the gunman that shot into the room looked like the eyewitness replied:
“I couldn’t see a face, he had a black hat on […] black cargo pants, the kind with the big puffy pockets on the side […] long sleeve shirt […] gloves […huge assault riffle […] six magazines […] I just saw three dressed exactly the same”.
“You are certain you saw three men,” the newscaster asked Abdelmageed.
“Yes,” said Abdelmageed.
“It looked like their skin color was white. They look like they were athletic build and they appeared to be tall.”
In a shill-like manner the CBS reporter responded, “And of course we just learned that one suspect was a woman.”
To boot it also appears as if the suspects legal team believes their clients may have been made out by authorities and/or the media to be patsies further allowing for gun control narratives to be pushed onto the public.
The suspects legal team also questions the validity of the Sandy Hook shooting which some believe never took place and may have been a live active shooter drill, usingcrisis actors, perpetuated by the establishment media as a ‘mass shooting’ as coveredheavily by Intellihub in the past.
“President Barack Obama will make a rare primetime address to the nation Sunday laying out how he will keep Americans safe and defeat the Islamic State group, days after 14 people were shot dead in California,” AFP reports.
May I now ask the question: what the hell is going on here?
Update: Interestingly, All News Pipeline is reporting that a west coast source told them that police are still actively looking for a third suspect.
In regards to the 3rd shooter that has left out of the media reports of late, I grew up about 30 minutes west of the shooting. My brother currently lives in San Bernardino off of the 215 and waterman. (up the hill a little) I live in San Clemente CA, but still have friends and family in the area.
Last night I spoke with a friend who has friends in local law enforcement. The inside source said that there indeed was a 3rd shooter and the whole situation is still active.
The media is no longer talking about it because they don’t want to alarm the public, but the inside source did warn my friend to avoid crowded areas such as malls and theaters in the days to come. Everyone needs to be very aware of their surroundings.
About the Author:
Shepard Ambellas is an activist, journalist, filmmaker, film producer, radio talk show host and the founder and editor-in-chief of Intellihub. Established in 2013, Intellihub.com is ranked in the upper 1% traffic tier on the World Wide Web.
For media inquires, interviews, questions, business opportunities, or suggestions for this author, email: [email protected].
DCC Editor’s Note: I feel this witness/story is important to document. However,… I looked at Sally’s Facebook profile and she appears to be part of a Muslim family. She posted, on Facebook, to seemingly let friends and family know that she was safe. Also noteworthy is that a large percentage of those who commented on her Facebook status would also appear to have Arab names. Does that make you feel differently about her testimony? It causes me to take it with a grain of salt. Ever heard of taqiyya? I’m just suggesting it is a possibility. Was she discredited, by investigators, as a witness? Is she possibly viewed as a person of interest herself? Her testimony could be her attempt to conceal the truth. I don’t think the first thought of most people in that situation would be to post to Facebook, but that doesn’t mean it is not possible. Just because this witness has seemingly not been taken seriously, it does not mean that she is telling the truth. That’s my opinion. What’s yours? -Dean Garrison, Publisher, D.C. Clothesline