Actress Pamela Anderson has the distinction of having her air-brushed naked image adorn the cover and centerfold of pornographic Playboy magazine more often than any other woman — 15 times — including the magazine’s last print issue (January/February 2016).

Anderson also caused an Internet “sensation” when her two explicit sex tapes were “leaked”—one in 1995 with her then-husband, the satanic-looking rocker Tommy Lee; the other with singer Bret Michaels, images from which were published in 1998 in the even more pornographic Penthouse magazine.

Now, at age 49, Anderson has suddenly turned sanctimonious.

Pamela Anderson without makeup

take our poll - story continues below

Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?

  • Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

In an op/ed in Wednesday’s Wall St. Journal, which she co-authored with celebrity rabbi and author of Kosher Sex Shmuley Boteach, Anderson wants us to “take the pledge” and eschew porn because of “the devastation that porn addiction wreaks on those closest to the addict”.

The op/ed begins with a reference to Anthony Weiner’s repeated sexting as an example of porn addiction. Weiner, of course, is the former Democratic NY Congressman and husband of Hillary Clinton’s close aide (and rumored lesbian lover) Huma Abedin. Huma recently separated from Weiner after news of him sending a sex text of himself lying in bed next to their 4-year-old son.

Below is the full text of Anderson’s op/ed:

If anyone still had doubts about the addictive dangers of pornography, Anthony Weiner should have put paid to them with his repeated, self-sabotaging sexting.

And if anyone still doubted the devastation that porn addiction wreaks on those closest to the addict, behold the now-shattered marriage of Mr. Weiner and Huma Abedin, a breakup that she initiated, reportedly, in shock at the disgraced ex-congressman’s inclusion of their 4-year-old son in one lewd photo that he sent to a near-stranger.

From our respective positions of rabbi-counselor and former Playboy model and actress, we have often warned about pornography’s corrosive effects on a man’s soul and on his ability to function as husband and, by extension, as father. This is a public hazard of unprecedented seriousness given how freely available, anonymously accessible and easily disseminated pornography is nowadays.

Put another way, we are a guinea-pig generation for an experiment in mass debasement that few of us would have ever consented to, and whose full nefarious impact may not be known for years. How many families will suffer? How many marriages will implode? How many talented men will scrap their most important relationships and careers for a brief onanistic thrill? How many children will propel, warp-speed, into the dark side of adult sexuality by forced exposure to their fathers’ profanations?

The statistics already available are terrifying. According to data provided by the American Psychological Association, porn consumption rates are between 50% and 99% among men and 30% to 86% among women, with the former group often reporting less satisfactory intimate lives with their wives or girlfriends as a result of the consumption. By contrast, many female fans of pornography tend to prefer a less explicit variety, and report that it improves their sexual relationships.

Nine percent of porn users said they had tried unsuccessfully to stop—an indication of addiction that is all the more startling when you consider that the dependency rate among people who try marijuana is the same—9%—and not much higher among those who try cocaine (15%), according to the National Center for Biotechnology Information.

But it is a fair guess that whereas drug-dependency data are mostly stable, the incidence of porn addiction will only spiral as the children now being raised in an environment of wall-to-wall, digitized sexual images become adults inured to intimacy and in need of even greater graphic stimulation. They are the crack babies of porn.

All people are unique individuals and we can be sure that Mr. Weiner’s problems are at least in part a matter of his personal psycho-pathologies. Yet his behavior squares with what we have observed with all too many men, especially in the U.S. or other Western countries that enjoy liberal values and material prosperity. These are men who, by any objective measure, have succeeded yet regard themselves as failures. These are men who feel marooned in lassitude because they enjoy physical security, who feel bereft and bored even if they are blessed to have the committed love of a wife or girlfriend. These are men who believe that cruising the internet for explicit footage of other women or sharing such images of themselves over the remote communication offered by smartphones are risqué but risk-free distractions from the tedium.

The march of technology is irreversible and we aren’t so naive as to believe that any kind of imposed regulation could ever reseal the Pandora’s box of pornography. What is required is an honest dialogue about what we are witnessing—the true nature and danger of porn—and an honor code to tamp it down in the collective interests of our well-being as individuals, as families and as communities.

The ubiquity of porn is an outgrowth of the sexual revolution that began a half-century ago and which, with gender rights and freedoms now having been established, has arguably run its course. Now is the time for an epochal shift in our private and public lives. Call it a “sensual revolution.”

The sensual revolution would replace pornography with eroticism—the alloying of sex with love, of physicality with personality, of the body’s mechanics with imagination, of orgasmic release with binding relationships. In an age where public disapproval is no longer an obstacle to personal disgrace, we must turn instead to the appeal of self-interest.

Simply put, we must educate ourselves and our children to understand that porn is for losers—a boring, wasteful and dead-end outlet for people too lazy to reap the ample rewards of healthy sexuality.

Not a word from Anderson that it is precisely “U.S. liberal values” that enable the publishing of Playboy and other porn, for which she owes whatever success she has as an actress and from which she materially benefitted. Not a word from Anderson that the “explicit” images and footages of women for which men cruise on the Internet include hers. And certainly not a word from Anderson admitting that her naked images in Playboy centerfolds had contributed to men’s porn addiction. Nor any word of regret or apology. Hypocrite.

I still remember seeing a news video of her many years ago, in which she was surrounded by a mob of salivating men in a foreign country she was visiting. The men close to her were actually grabbing her breasts.

Porn is a huge problem, greatly exacerbated by its availability on the Internet. There is now plenty of evidence of porn’s corrosive effects on how men view women and on relationships. But Pamela Anderson is hardly the person to scold men about it.

~Eowyn

Dr. Eowyn’s post first appeared at Fellowship of the Minds