As time passes, the official narrative surrounding the CONvid-1984 planned scam-demic gets more holes punched in it than an old style computer data card. Yet, puppet government officials continue to double and triple down on CONvid-1984 measures and injection mandates that carry punitive consequences for violation. A study recently released out of Columbia University drops a bombshell many of us already knew – the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) undercounts deaths. The underreporting of deaths amounted to a factor of 20.

J. D. Rucker, writing for The Liberty Daily, briefly covers the study.

Since the beginning of the Covid “vaccine” era, we’ve used the CDC’s VAERS data to illustrate how dangerous the jabs are to people. With nearly a million adverse reactions and approaching 20,000 reported deaths following the Covid injections, it’s clear that we’re well beyond the “rare” occurrences that vaxx-nannies tell us about.

take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

A new study from Columbia University isn’t drawing nearly the attention it deserves. Thankfully, Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA technology used in most of the Covid shots, noticed the study and broadcast it to his followers on Twitter.

“We discuss implications for public health policies related to boosters, school and workplace mandates, and the urgent need to identify, develop and disseminate diagnostics and treatments for life-altering vaccine injuries.”

— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) December 15, 2021

Rucker quoted the abstract of the study with important information bolded.

“Accurate estimates of COVID vaccine-induced severe adverse event and death rates are critical for risk-benefit ratio analyses of vaccination and boosters against SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in different age groups. However, existing surveillance studies are not designed to reliably estimate life-threatening event or vaccine-induced fatality rates (VFR). Here, regional variation in vaccination rates was used to predict all-cause mortality and non-COVID deaths in subsequent time periods using two independent, publicly available datasets from the US and Europe (month-and week-level resolutions, respectively).

Vaccination correlated negatively with mortality 6-20 weeks post-injection, while vaccination predicted all-cause mortality 0-5 weeks post-injection in almost all age groups and with an age-related temporal pattern consistent with the US vaccine rollout. Results from fitted regression slopes (p<0.05 FDR corrected) suggest a US national average VFR of 0.04% and higher VFR with age (VFR=0.004% in ages 0-17 increasing to 0.06% in ages >75 years), and 146K to 187K vaccine-associated US deaths between February and August, 2021. Notably, adult vaccination increased ulterior mortality of unvaccinated young (<18, US; <15, Europe).”

Comparing our estimate with the CDC-reported VFR (0.002%) suggests VAERS deaths are underreported by a factor of 20, consistent with known VAERS under-ascertainment bias. Comparing our age-stratified VFRs with published age-stratified coronavirus infection fatality rates (IFR) suggests the risks of COVID vaccines and boosters outweigh the benefits in children, young adults and older adults with low occupational risk or previous coronavirus exposure. We discuss implications for public health policies related to boosters, school and workplace mandates, and the urgent need to identify, develop and disseminate diagnostics and treatments for life-altering vaccine injuries.”

Rucker pointed out this study was done by researchers who support vaccines; but, these same researchers contended the worldwide push for experimental “vaccines” with severely limited testing that normally accompanies these medications has been premature. He postulates this is why these injections are proving to be ineffective and more dangerous than anyone in the medical community would willingly acknowledge. But, can we be certain the ineffectiveness is due to lack of testing and not because of intentional design? That is debatable. However, what the body of the study contained raised concerns.

TRENDING:  Hundreds of Migrants Storm Border Post with Morocco (Video)

Cumulating the monthly model-estimated deaths across all significant results from the

original models and from an additional 9 results from the two model variations mentioned above

yielded a total of 146,988 deaths attributed to COVID vaccinations between February and

August of 2021 (lower right cell of “Estimated Deaths” in Table 3). Applying the same procedure

while thresholding the results at a more liberal threshold (p<0.05 uncorrected) yielded an

You Might Like

estimated 168,908 vaccine-related deaths (Supplementary Table S6). The same procedure

applied using standard linear regression with a stringent threshold (p<0.05 corrected) yielded

133,382 deaths attributed to vaccination (Supplementary Table S7), while thresholding these

regression weights more liberally (p<0.05 uncorrected) yielded 187,402 vaccine associated

deaths (Supplementary Table S8).

Cumulating the monthly model-estimated deaths across all significant results from the

original models and from an additional 9 results from the two model variations mentioned above

yielded a total of 146,988 deaths attributed to COVID vaccinations between February and

August of 2021 (lower right cell of “Estimated Deaths” in Table 3). Applying the same procedure

while thresholding the results at a more liberal threshold (p<0.05 uncorrected) yielded an

estimated 168,908 vaccine-related deaths (Supplementary Table S6). The same procedure

applied using standard linear regression with a stringent threshold (p<0.05 corrected) yielded

133,382 deaths attributed to vaccination (Supplementary Table S7), while thresholding these

regression weights more liberally (p<0.05 uncorrected) yielded 187,402 vaccine associated

deaths (Supplementary Table S8).

On page 7, the study indicated:

Cumulating the monthly model-estimated deaths across all significant results with the original models and from an additional 9 results from the two model variations mentioned above yielded a total of 146,988 deaths attributed to COVID vaccinations between February and August of 2021 ….

Using the same procedure while using more liberal thresholds produced an estimated 168,908 vaccine-related deaths. A standard linear regression model indicated 133,382 deaths attributed to the vaccination while “thresholding these regression weights more liberally yielded 187,402 vaccine associated deaths”.

So according to the Columbia University study, the injection for COVID-19 has produced anywhere between 133,382 and 187,402 deaths between February and August of 2021. This is a significant finding proving the already known inadequacy of VAERS to track vaccine deaths and adverse events.

The authors explain on page 9 that calculation used did not rely upon VAERS and is limitations. “The estimate is based only on significant effects detected in our analysis, and hence likely represent a lower bound on the underreporting factor.” The authors also announce their estimates fall in line with a recently released independent estimate by Rose and Crawford that used US VAERS data through August 31, 2021.

TRENDING:  Lawsuit Against DHS Demands Release of Jeh Johnson’s Emails

On pages 10 and 11, the Columbia University study cited problems with previous studies reporting on safety and surveillance reports surrounding the COVID-19 injections. The authors postulate there existed human and technical errors in labeling groups or coding groups. Moreover, the Columbia University study indicated the authors of these other studies used data not publicly available and two authors reported receiving funding from Pfizer.

Since the push is on to inject our children from the time of birth with these COVID-19 injections, the authors’ conclusion that “…the numbers clearly show that the benefits of vaccination do not outweigh the risks in anyone aged 25 or under.” (page 12, 4th paragraph, last sentence)

Under the section, “Implications for Public Health Policy”, the authors clearly stated, “There is little to no evidence that vaccines reduce community spread and transmission”. Moreover, the study authors indicated, “we do not see much benefit in vaccine mandates other than increasing serviceable obtainable market (SOM) share for the vaccine companies”. They cite separate references that discuss in-depth why vaccine mandates are not based on “sound science” and growing evidence base for alternative prevention and early treatment options.

So again, why the push to mandate a product that is shown to be deadly and cause horrendous injury? It is to increase the money shares for the vaccine companies – plain and simple. It has never been about health, but many of us knew that from the beginning. If it had been about health, the medical community and government public health entities would have provided information on actual measures that would enhance your health and immune system instead of compromising it; allowed medications many physicians found that would alleviate the ailment to be prescribed early instead of urging treatments that killed more than it saved; and encouraged natural means and supplements to assist in staving off illness.

If you read the article, “Reiner Fullmich Interview with Ernst Wolff Exposes True Nature of Puppetry Government“, you will understand those who are perpetuating this COVID-19 scenario are the tools of those on the world stage who seek to eradicate much of humanity and enslave those they deem worthy to survive.

Make no mistake, we are in the fight for our very survival against the very governments charged with protecting our liberties. It’s time to stand up and resist en masse.